A psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory - II

被引:1138
作者
Dozois, DJA [1 ]
Dobson, KS [1 ]
Ahnberg, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.83
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article provides psychometric information on the second edition of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II; A. T. Beck, R. A. Steer, & G. K. Brown, 1996), with respect to internal consistency, factorial validity, and gender differences. Both measures demonstrated high internal reliability in the full student sample. Significant differences between the mean BDI and BDI-II scores necessitated the development of new cutoffs for analogue research on the BDI-II. Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a 2-factor solution optimally summarized the data for both versions of the inventory and accounted for a cumulative 41% and 46% of the common variance in BDI and BDI-II responses, respectively. These factor solutions were reliably cross-validated, although the importance of each factor varied by gender. The authors conclude that the BDI-II is a stronger instrument than the BDI in terms of its factor structure.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
[2]  
[Anonymous], LISREL 8 11
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Anxiety and depression, distinctive and overlapping features
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, HDB DEPRESSION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Multivariate Analysis
[6]  
BECH P, 1992, HDB AFFECTIVE DISORD, P3
[7]  
Beck A. T., 1979, COGNITIVE THERAPY DE
[8]  
Beck A. T., 1996, BDI 2 BECK DEPRESSIO, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00742-000
[9]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[10]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100