Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with'

被引:188
作者
Jensen, RA [1 ]
Thursby, JG
Thursby, MC
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] NBER, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00083-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the interplay of the three major university actors in technology transfer from universities to industry: the faculty, the technology transfer office (TTO), and the central administration. We model the faculty as an agent of the administration, and the TTO as an agent of both the faculty and the administration. Empirical tests of the theory are based on evidence from our survey of 62 US research universities. We find that the TTOs reported licensing objectives are influenced by their views of faculty and administration, which supports the assumption that the TTO is a dual agent. The theory yields predictions for whether or not faculty disclose inventions and if so, at what stage, which in turn affects license contract terms. We also examine how the portion of inventions disclosed at different stages varies with faculty quality. Quality is found to be inversely related to the share of license income allotted to faculty. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1300
页数:30
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Henderson, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (01) :44-60
[2]  
[Anonymous], 7256 NBER
[3]   Self-other agreement: Does it really matter? [J].
Atwater, LE ;
Ostroff, C ;
Yammarino, FJ ;
Fleenor, JW .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :577-598
[4]  
Bercovitz J., 2001, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE, V26, P21, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1007828026904
[5]  
DIGREGORIAO D, 2000, WHY DO SOME U GENERA
[6]  
Hoppe H. C, 2001, INTERMEDIATION INNOV
[7]   Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions [J].
Jensen, R ;
Thursby, M .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (01) :240-259
[8]  
Krosnick J, 1997, DESIGNING RATING SCA
[9]  
Lach S., 2002, INCENTIVES INVENTIVE
[10]  
LEWIS KS, 2001, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE, V26, P233