Ocean-atmosphere coupling and the boreal winter MJO

被引:33
作者
Kim, Hye-Mi [1 ]
Hoyos, Carlos D. [1 ]
Webster, Peter J. [1 ]
Kang, In-Sik [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Ocean-atmosphere coupling; MJO; Prediction; MADDEN-JULIAN OSCILLATION; ASIAN SUMMER MONSOON; TROPICAL INTRASEASONAL OSCILLATION; SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; STATISTICAL FORECAST MODEL; EXTENDED-RANGE PREDICTION; CONVECTION PARAMETERIZATION; INTERANNUAL VARIATIONS; GENERAL-CIRCULATION; AGCM SIMULATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00382-009-0612-x
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The influence of ocean-atmosphere coupling on the simulation and prediction of the boreal winter Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) is examined using the Seoul National University coupled general circulation model (CGCM) and atmospheric-only model (AGCM). The AGCM is forced with daily SSTs interpolated from pentad mean CGCM SSTs. Forecast skill is examined using serial extended simulations spanning 26 different winter seasons with 30-day forecasts commencing every 5 days providing a total of 598 30-day simulations. By comparing both sets of experiments, which share the same atmospheric components, the influence of coupled ocean-atmosphere processes on the simulation and prediction of MJO can be studied. The mean MJO intensity possesses more realistic amplitude in the CGCM than in AGCM. In general, the ocean-atmosphere coupling acts to improve the simulation of the spatio-temporal evolution of the eastward propagating MJO and the phase relationship between convection (OLR) and SST over the equatorial Indian Ocean and the western Pacific. Both the CGCM and observations exhibit a near-quadrature relationship between OLR and SST, with the former lagging by about two pentads. However, the AGCM shows a less realistic phase relationship. As the initial conditions are the same in both models, the additional forcing by SST anomalies in the CGCM extends the prediction skill beyond that of the AGCM. To test the applicability of the CGCM to real-time prediction, we compute the Real-time Multivariate MJO (RMM) index and compared it with the index computed from observations. RMM1 (RMM2) falls away rapidly to 0.5 after 17-18 (15-16) days in the AGCM and 18-19 (16-17) days in the CGCM. The prediction skill is phase dependent in both the CGCM and AGCM.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 784
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Transition between suppressed and active phases of intraseasonal oscillations in the indo-pacific warm pool [J].
Agudelo, P. A. ;
Curry, J. A. ;
Hoyos, C. D. ;
Webster, P. J. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (21) :5519-5530
[2]   Application of a serial extended forecast experiment using the ECMWF model to interpret the predictive skill of tropical intraseasonal variability [J].
Agudelo, P. A. ;
Hoyos, C. D. ;
Webster, P. J. ;
Curry, J. A. .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2009, 32 (06) :855-872
[3]  
Bergman JW, 2001, J CLIMATE, V14, P1702, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1702:IASIAT>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
Bonan GB, 1998, J CLIMATE, V11, P1307, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1307:TLSCOT>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
CHEN TC, 1990, MON WEATHER REV, V118, P2607, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<2607:SEITAA>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
FERRANTI L, 1990, J ATMOS SCI, V47, P2177, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<2177:TEIAWT>2.0.CO
[10]  
2