How corporate social performance is institutionalised within the governance structure

被引:23
作者
de Graaf, Frank J. [1 ]
Herkstroeter, Cor A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Corporate Responsibil Fdn, Amsterdam Business Sch, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
corporate governance; corporate social performance; stakeholder influence;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-006-9229-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since Ackerman in Corporate social responsiveness, the modern dilemma (1973), pleaded for the institutionalisation of corporate social performance (CSP) in business processes, researchers have focused on the role of strategy in CSP. This article demonstrates that CSP is institutionalised within the governance structure. We will attempt to make this clear by means of a description of the Dutch system of corporate governance. Under certain circumstances Dutch companies are already bound to CSP due to prevailing legislation. A governance perspective shows that CSP is institutionalised within a company's governance structure. "Processes of responsiveness", since long regarded as a starting point of CSP-analysis, appear to be decision-making processes. Within these processes the expectations of the stakeholders can be institutionalised, trust can be built and interests can be incorporated. This makes CSP context-dependent. However, it is possible to analyse companies by comparing the companies' individual governance structures. The article concludes that CSP-analysis can fruitfully extend into analysing in the role of the stakeholders in the influence-pathways that are incorporated within the governance structure.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 189
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ACKERMAN RW, 1973, HARVARD BUS REV, V51, P88
[2]  
BAUER RA, 1976, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES
[3]  
BERMAN S, 2000, BUSINESS SOC, V39, P397
[4]  
Bovens Mark., 1998, QUEST RESPONSIBILITY
[5]   Organizational governance and ethical systems: A covenantal approach to building trust [J].
Caldwell, C ;
Karri, R .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 58 (1-3) :249-259
[6]  
Carroll A. B., 1979, The Academy of Management Review, V4, P497, DOI [DOI 10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296, DOI 10.2307/257850, 10.2307/257850]
[7]   Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance [J].
Coffey, BS ;
Wang, J .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1998, 17 (14) :1595-1603
[8]   Stakeholder learning dialogues: How to preserve ethical responsibility in networks [J].
Daboub, AJ ;
Calton, JM .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2002, 41 (1-2) :85-98
[9]   Toward a stewardship theory of management [J].
Davis, JH ;
Schoorman, FD ;
Donaldson, L .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (01) :20-47
[10]   STOCKHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE [J].
FREEMAN, RE ;
REED, DL .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1983, 25 (03) :88-106