An objective comparison of pre-processing methods for enhancement of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data

被引:17
作者
Fredriksson, Mattias
Petersson, Patrik
Magnus, Joerten-Karlsson
Axelsson, Bengt-Olof
Bylund, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Nat Sci, S-85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
[2] AstraZeneca, Res & Dev, SE-22187 Lund, Sweden
关键词
filter; liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry; chemometrics; noise;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.077
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Four data pre-processing methods have been applied with different settings to data sets obtained from the analysis of a pharmaceutical drug and its degradation products by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The methods compared were the frequently used component detection algorithm (CODA) and three kinds of digital filters-matched filtration (W), Gaussian second derivative (GSD) and Savitzky-Golay. The aim was to evaluate the performance and robustness of these methods for extracted ion chromatogram (XIC), total ion chromatogram (TIC) and base peak chromatogram (BPC) in the presence of different types of noise. In accordance with theory, the best improvements in signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the XICs were obtained with MF under the ideal case with random white noise. However, when highly coloured noise was present, it was found that no improvements in XIC S/N could be obtained with any of the pre-processing methods studied. GSD and CODA did, however, improve the S/N for both TIC and BPC. GSD and CODA also significantly reduced the background in the spectral domain, thereby facilitating the interpretation of the mass spectra. Another advantage associated with CODA and to some extent also with GSD is their data reduction ability. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 150
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A universal denoising and peak picking algorithm for LC-MS based on matched filtration in the chromatographic time domain [J].
Andreev, VP ;
Rejtar, T ;
Chen, HS ;
Moskovets, EV ;
Ivanov, AR ;
Karger, BL .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (22) :6314-6326
[2]   SMOOTHING AND DIFFERENTIATION BY AN ADAPTIVE-DEGREE POLYNOMIAL FILTER [J].
BARAK, P .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 67 (17) :2758-2762
[3]  
Brown CD, 1999, J CHEMOMETR, V13, P133, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199903/04)13:2<133::AID-CEM533>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-3
[5]   Matched filtering with background suppression for improved quality of base peak chromatograms and mass spectra in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J].
Danielsson, R ;
Bylund, D ;
Markides, KE .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 454 (02) :167-184
[6]   A perfect smoother [J].
Eilers, PHC .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (14) :3631-3636
[7]  
Elliott MA, 1999, MAGN RESON MED, V41, P450, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199903)41:3<450::AID-MRM4>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-9
[9]   Windowed mass selection method: a new data processing algorithm for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data [J].
Fleming, CM ;
Kowalski, BR ;
Apffel, A ;
Hancock, WS .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1999, 849 (01) :71-85
[10]   DIFFERENTIAL GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHIC MASS-SPECTROMETRY [J].
GHOSH, A ;
ANDEREGG, RJ .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1989, 61 (01) :73-77