Comparative life cycle assessment of three biohydrogen pathways

被引:68
作者
Djomo, Sylvestre Njakou [1 ,2 ]
Blumberga, Dagnija [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Biol, Res Grp Plant & Vegetat Ecol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Riga Tech Univ, Fac Power & Elect Engn, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia
关键词
Hydrogen; Energy balance; Wheat straw; Potato peels; Sweet sorghum stalk; BIOLOGICAL HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; SWEET SORGHUM; ENERGY; BIOETHANOL; BIOMASS; PRETREATMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.139
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A life cycle assessment was performed to quantify and compare the energetic and environmental performances of hydrogen from wheat straw (WS-H-2), sweet sorghum stalk (SSS-H-2), and steam potato peels (SPP-H-2). Inventory data were derived from a pilot plant. Impacts were assessed using the impact 2002+ method. When co-product was not considered, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 5.60 kg CO2eq kg(-1) H-2 for WS-H-2, 5.32 kg CO2eq kg(-1) H-2 for SSS-H-2, and 5.18 kg CO2eq kg(-1) H-2 for SPP-H-2 center dot BioH(2) pathways reduced GHG emissions by 52-56% compared to diesel and by 54-57% compared to steam methane reforming production of H2. The energy ratios (ER) were also comparable: 1.08 for WS-H-2, 1.14 for SSS-H-2 and 1.17 for SPP-H-2. A shift from SPP-H-2 to WS-H2 would therefore not affect the ER and GHG emissions of these BioH2 pathways. When co-product was considered, a shift from SPP-H2 to WS-H2 or SSS-H2 decreased the ER, while increasing the GHG emissions significantly. Co-product yield should be considered when selecting BioH(2) feedstocks. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2684 / 2694
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IMPLEMENTATION LIFE
[4]   Blofuels generation from sweet sorghum: Fermentative hydrogen production and anaerobic digestion of the remaining biomass [J].
Antonopoulou, Georgia ;
Gavala, Hariklia N. ;
Skiadas, Ioannis V. ;
Angelopoulos, K. ;
Lyberatos, Gerasimos .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (01) :110-119
[5]   Hydrogen biotechnology: Progress and prospects [J].
Benemann, J .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 14 (09) :1101-1103
[6]   Structure and composition of sweet sorghum stalk components [J].
Billa, E ;
Koullas, DP ;
Monties, B ;
Koukios, EG .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 1997, 6 (3-4) :297-302
[7]  
Claassen P.A.M., 2004, TOT FOOD EXPL COPR M, P173
[8]  
Claassen P.A.M., 2000, P 1 WORLD C BIOM EN, VII, P1665
[9]   Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers [J].
Claassen, PAM ;
van Lier, JB ;
Contreras, AML ;
van Niel, EWJ ;
Sijtsma, L ;
Stams, AJM ;
de Vries, SS ;
Weusthuis, RA .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1999, 52 (06) :741-755
[10]   Non-thermal production of pure hydrogen from biomass: HYVOLUTION [J].
Claassen, Pietemel A. M. ;
de Vrije, T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2006, 31 (11) :1416-1423