An evaluation of intelligent prognostic systems for colorectal cancer

被引:23
作者
Anand, SS [1 ]
Smith, AE
Hamilton, PW
Anand, JS
Hughes, JG
Bartels, PH
机构
[1] Univ Ulster, No Ireland Knowledge Engn Lab, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Pathol, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Univ Arizona, Ctr Opt Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
colorectal cancer; artificial intelligence; hybrid system; Cox's regression;
D O I
10.1016/S0933-3657(98)00052-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper we describe attempts at building a robust model for predicting the length of survival of patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of the research, reported in this paper, is to study the effective utilisation of artificial intelligence techniques in the medical domain. We suggest that an important research objective of proponents of intelligent prognostic systems must be to evaluate the additionality that AI techniques can bring to an already well-established field of medical prognosis. Towards this end, we compare a number of different AI techniques that lend themselves to the task of predicting survival in colorectal cancer patients. We describe the pros and cons of each of these methods using the usual metrics of accuracy and perspicuity. We then present the notion of intelligent hybrid systems and evaluate the role that they may potentially play in developing robust prognostic models. In particular we evaluate a hybrid system that utilises the k Nearest Neighbour technique in conjunction with Genetic Algorithms. We describe a number of innovations used within this hybrid paradigm used to build the prognostic model. We discuss the issue of censored patients and how this issue can be tackled within the various models used. In keeping with our objective of studying the additionality that AI techniques bring to building prognostic models, we use Cox's regression as a standard and compare each AI technique with it, attempting to discover their capabilities in enhancing prognostic methods in medicine. In doing so we address two main questions-which model fits the data best?, and are the results obtained by the various Al techniques significantly different from those of Cox's regression? We conclude this paper by discussing future enhancements to the work presented and lessons learned from the study to date. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 214
页数:22
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Anand SS, 1998, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V1394, P13
  • [2] Anand SS, 1998, FIFTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-98) AND TENTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE (IAAI-98) - PROCEEDINGS, P574
  • [3] Designing a kernel for data mining
    Anand, SS
    Scotney, BW
    Tan, MG
    McClean, SI
    Bell, DA
    Hughes, JG
    Magill, IC
    [J]. IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS & THEIR APPLICATIONS, 1997, 12 (02): : 65 - 74
  • [4] Artificial neural networks applied to outcome prediction for colorectal cancer patients in separate institutions
    Bottaci, L
    Drew, PJ
    Hartley, JE
    Hadfield, MB
    Farouk, R
    Lee, PWR
    Macintyre, IMC
    Duthie, GS
    Monson, JRT
    [J]. LANCET, 1997, 350 (9076) : 469 - 472
  • [5] Buyse M, 1997, LANCET, V350, P1175, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63819-6
  • [6] A WEIGHTED NEAREST NEIGHBOR ALGORITHM FOR LEARNING WITH SYMBOLIC FEATURES
    COST, S
    SALZBERG, S
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 1993, 10 (01) : 57 - 78
  • [7] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [8] CRAIGHURST R, 1995, P 6 INT C GEN ALG, P130
  • [9] The classification of cancer of the rectum
    Dukes, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY, 1932, 35 (03): : 323 - 332
  • [10] EBELL MH, 1993, J FAM PRACTICE, V36, P297