Multi-platform comparisons of MODIS and AVHRR normalized difference vegetation index data

被引:110
作者
Gallo, K [1 ]
Li, L
Reed, B
Eidenshink, J
Dwyer, J
机构
[1] NOAA, NESDIS, Camp Springs, MD 20746 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, CIRA, Ft Collins, CO 80525 USA
[3] USGS EROS, SAIC, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
关键词
AVHRR; MODIS; VIIRS; normalized difference vegetation index; composite; data continuity;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The relationship between AVHRR-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values and those of future sensors is critical to continued long-term monitoring of land surface properties. The follow-on operational sensor to the AVHRR, the Visible/Infrared Imager/Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), will be very similar to the NASA Earth Observing System's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor. NDVI data derived from visible and near-infrared data acquired by the MODIS (Terra and Aqua platforms) and AVHRR (NOAA-16 and NOAA-17) sensors were compared over the same time periods and a variety of land cover classes within the conterminous United States. The results indicate that the 16-day composite NDVI values are quite similar over the composite intervals of 2002 and 2003, and linear relationships exist between the NDVI values from the various sensors. The composite AVHRR NDVI data included water and cloud masks and adjustments for water vapor as did the MODIS NDVI data. When analyzed over a variety of land cover types and composite intervals, the AVHRR derived NDVI data were associated with 89% or more of the variation in the MODIS NDVI values. The results suggest that it may be possible to successfully reprocess historical AVHRR data sets to provide continuity of NDVI products through future sensor systems. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 231
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Water vapour correction of the daily 1 km AVHRR global land dataset: part I - validation and use of the Water Vapour input field [J].
DeFelice, TP ;
Lloyd, D ;
Meyer, DJ ;
Baltzer, TT ;
Piraino, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (11) :2365-2375
[2]  
ELSALEOUS N, 1994, P IGARRS 94 INT GEOS
[3]  
FRESHOLT R, 2004, INT J REMOTE SENS, V25, P1641
[4]   Comparison of MODIS and AVHRR 16-day normalized difference vegetation index composite data [J].
Gallo, K ;
Ji, L ;
Reed, B ;
Dwyer, J ;
Eidenshink, J .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (07) :L075021-4
[5]   Multisensor comparisons and validation of MODIS vegetation indices at the semiarid Jornada experimental range [J].
Gao, X ;
Huete, AR ;
Didan, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (10) :2368-2381
[6]   MODIS NDVI optimization to fit the AVHRR data series spectral considerations [J].
Gitelson, AA ;
Kaufman, YJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 66 (03) :343-350
[7]   Development of a 2001 National Land-Cover Database for the United States [J].
Homer, C ;
Huang, CQ ;
Yang, LM ;
Wylie, B ;
Coan, M .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 70 (07) :829-840
[8]   Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices [J].
Huete, A ;
Didan, K ;
Miura, T ;
Rodriguez, EP ;
Gao, X ;
Ferreira, LG .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 83 (1-2) :195-213
[9]  
Kogan FN, 1997, B AM METEOROL SOC, V78, P621, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0621:GDWFS>2.0.CO
[10]  
2