A bioeconomic analysis of bushmeat hunting

被引:95
作者
Damania, R [1 ]
Milner-Gulland, EJ [1 ]
Crookes, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Ashanti; Ghana; snaring; gun hunting; agriculture; household economy;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2004.2945
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Unsustainable bushmeat hunting is a major threat to mammal species, particularly in West/Central Africa. We developed a multispecies dynamic simulation model of hunter behaviour, parameterized using data from the Ashanti region, Ghana. The model distinguishes between two hunting techniques, snaring and gun hunting. We analyse the impact of key economic parameters on off-takes. Economic incentives determine the effort devoted to hunting, the choice of hunting technique, and the species that are consumed domestically or traded in markets. These factors, together with the growth rates and catchabilities of hunted species, determine the ecological impact of hunting. The results suggest that increased bushmeat prices are likely to lead to a switch from snaring, which is cheaper but less efficient, to gun hunting, with a consequent impact on vulnerable species. Increases in agricultural prices have an ambiguous effect on hunter behaviour, depending on the balance between incentives to invest in agriculture and increased consumption as incomes improve. Penalties are more effective if they target bushmeat sales, rather than the act of hunting. This model represents a step forward because it explicitly considers bushmeat as a component of the household economy. This has important implications as regards the development of policies to conserve species hunted for bushmeat.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, BUSHMEAT NATURAL RES
[2]  
Auzel P, 2000, BIOL RESOURCE MANAGE, P413
[3]  
Bakarr M. I., 2001, ADV APPL BIODIVERSIT, V2
[4]   Wildlife harvest in integrated conservation and development projects: Linking harvest to household demand, agricultural production, and environmental shocks in the Serengeti [J].
Barrett, CB ;
Arcese, P .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1998, 74 (04) :449-465
[5]  
BEGON M., 1996, POPULATION ECOLOGY U
[6]   Is there a link between wild meat and food security? [J].
Bennett, EL .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) :590-592
[7]  
BROWN D, 2003, ODI WILDLIFE POLICY, V2
[8]  
Clark C. W, 1990, MATH BIOECONOMICS OP
[9]  
COWLISHAW G, 2005, IN PRESS CONSERV BIO
[10]   The economics of protecting tiger populations: Linking household behavior to poaching and prey depletion [J].
Damania, R ;
Stringer, R ;
Karanth, KU ;
Stith, B .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (02) :198-216