Moral hazard under commercial and universal banking

被引:117
作者
Boyd, JH [1 ]
Chang, C
Smith, BD
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Fed Reserve Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN 55480 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2601249
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Many claims have been made about the potential benefits and the potential costs of adopting a system of universal banking in the United States. We evaluate these claims using a model where there is a moral hazard problem between banks and "borrowers," a moral hazard problem between banks and a deposit insurer, and a costly state verification problem. Under conditions we describe, allowing banks to take equity positions in firms strengthens their ability to extract surplus, and exacerbates problems of moral hazard. The incentives of universal banks to take equity positions will often be strongest when these problems are most severe.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 468
页数:43
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AKERLOF GA, 1993, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1
[2]   A WELFARE COMPARISON OF INTERMEDIARIES AND FINANCIAL-MARKETS IN GERMANY AND THE US [J].
ALLEN, F ;
GALE, D .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 39 (02) :179-209
[3]  
[Anonymous], UNIVERSAL BANKING PE
[4]   Bank equity stakes in borrowing firms and financial distress [J].
Berlin, M ;
John, K ;
Saunders, A .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1996, 9 (03) :889-919
[5]  
BOOT A, 1994, FINANCIAL SYSTEM ARC
[6]  
BOOT AWA, IN PRESS REV FINANCI
[7]   HOW GOOD ARE STANDARD DEBT CONTRACTS - STOCHASTIC VERSUS NONSTOCHASTIC MONITORING IN A COSTLY STATE VERIFICATION ENVIRONMENT [J].
BOYD, JH ;
SMITH, BD .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1994, 67 (04) :539-561
[8]  
CORRIGAN G, 1983, ANN REPORT
[9]  
CORRIGAN G, 1987, SEPARATION BANKING C
[10]  
Dewatripont M., 2020, MORALITY MARKETS NAT