A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy

被引:320
作者
Duffas, JP
Suc, B
Msika, S
Fourtanier, G
Muscari, F
Hay, JM
Fingerhut, A [1 ]
Millat, B
Radovanowic, A
Fagniez, PL
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Intercommunal, Digest Surg Unit, Poissy, France
[2] Hop Louis Mourier, Digest Surg Unit, F-92701 Colombes, France
[3] CHU Rangueil, Digest Surg Unit, F-31054 Toulouse, France
[4] Hop St Eloi, Digest Surg Unit, Montpellier, France
[5] Hop Henri Mondor, Digest Surg Unit, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
pancreatic resection; pancreatic fistula; pancreatic tumor; pancreatic carcinoma; chronic pancreatitis; pancreatoduodenectomy; postoperative complications; postoperative mortality; morbidity; extrapancreatic tumor; pancreatogastrostomy; pancreatojejunostomy; anastomosis; univariate analysis; multivariate analysis; risk factors; center effect;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Only 2 large (more than 100 patients) prospective trials comparing pancreatogastrostomy (PG) with pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported until now. One nonrandomized study showed that there were less pancreatic and digestive tract fistula with PG, whereas the other, a randomized trial from a single high-volume center, found no significant differences between the two techniques. Methods: Single blind, controlled randomized, multicenter trial. The main endpoint was intra-abdominal complications (IACs). Results: Of 149 randomized patients, 81 underwent PG and 68 PJ. No significant difference was found between the two groups concerning pre-or intraoperative patient characteristics. The rate of patients with one or more IACs was 34% in each group. Twenty-seven patients sustained a pancreatoenteric fistula (18%), 13 in PG (16%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8-24%) and 14 in PJ (20%; 95% Cl 10.5-29.5%). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups concerning the mortality rate (11% overall), the rate of reoperations and/or postoperative interventional radiology drainages (23%), or the length of hospital stay (median 20.5 days). Univariate analysis found the following risk factors: (1) age :70 years old, (2) extrapancreatic disease, (3) normal consistency of pancreas, (4) diameter of main pancreatic duct < 3 mm, (5) duration of operation > 6 hours, and (6) a center effect. Significantly more IAC, pancreatoenteric fistula, and deaths occurred in one center (that included the most patients) (P =.05), but there were significantly more high-risk patients in this center (normal pancreas consistency, extrapancreatic pathology, small pancreatic duct, higher transfusion requirements, and duration of operation > 6 hours) compared with the other centers. In multivariate analysis, the center effect disappeared. Independent risk factors included duration of operation > 6 hours for IAC and for pancreatoenteric fistula (P =.01), extrapancreatic disease for pancreatoenteric fistulas (P <.04), and age;>= 70 years for mortality (P <.02). Conclusions: The type of pancreatoenteric anastomosis (PJ or PG) after PD does not significantly influence the rate of patients with one or more IAC and/or pancreatic fistula or the severity of complications. (c) 2005 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 729
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[2]
Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery [J].
Bruce, J ;
Krukowski, ZH ;
Al-Khairy, G ;
Russell, EM ;
Park, KGM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (09) :1157-1168
[3]
ROLE OF OCTREOTIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING PANCREATIC RESECTION [J].
BUCHLER, M ;
FRIESS, H ;
KLEMPA, I ;
HERMANEK, P ;
SULKOWSKI, U ;
BECKER, H ;
SCHAFMAYER, A ;
BACA, I ;
LORENZ, D ;
MEISTER, R ;
KREMER, B ;
WAGNER, P ;
WITTE, J ;
ZURMAYER, EL ;
SAEGER, HD ;
RIECK, B ;
DOLLINGER, P ;
GLASER, K ;
TEICHMANN, R ;
KONRADT, J ;
GAUS, W ;
DENNLER, HJ ;
WELZEL, D ;
BEGER, HG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (01) :125-131
[4]
100 AND 45 CONSECUTIVE PANCREATICODUODENECTOMIES WITHOUT MORTALITY [J].
CAMERON, JL ;
PITT, HA ;
YEO, CJ ;
LILLEMOE, KD ;
KAUFMAN, HS ;
COLEMAN, J ;
HERRINGTON, JL ;
MASON, GR ;
BRADLEY, EL ;
JORDAN, GL ;
GADACZ, TR ;
VANHEERDEN, JA ;
WATKINS, GH ;
COPELAND, EH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 217 (05) :430-438
[5]
*CANC RES CAMP WOR, 1980, BRIT MED J, V281, P918
[6]
Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection [J].
Conlon, KC ;
Labow, D ;
Leung, D ;
Smith, A ;
Jarnagin, W ;
Coit, DG ;
Merchant, N ;
Brennan, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (04) :487-493
[7]
COPELAND GP, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P356
[8]
DANDREA AA, 1994, ITAL J GASTROENTEROL, V26, P283
[9]
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE PREVENTION OF COMPLICATIONS BY OCTREOTIDE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS [J].
FRIESS, H ;
BEGER, HG ;
SULKOWSKI, U ;
BECKER, H ;
HOFBAUER, B ;
DENNLER, HJ ;
BUCHLER, MW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (09) :1270-1273
[10]
GRACE PA, 1992, ANN SURG, V127, P945