Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

被引:224
作者
Blute, ML
Bergstralh, EJ
Iocca, A
Scherer, B
Zincke, H
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
forecasting; prostatic neoplasms; disease progression; algorithms; prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1097/00005392-200101000-00030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determine the importance of clinical and pathological variables for predicting biochemical progression in patients after surgery for specimen confined prostate cancer. We developed a simple scoring algorithm for biochemical progression in node negative cases and tested the algorithm performance on an independent group. Materials and Methods: Our study included 2,518 patients with pTSN0 or pT3N0 disease treated between 1990 and 1993. Gleason score, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), margin status, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, DNA ploidy and adjuvant treatment were primary variables analyzed univariately. The Cox proportional hazards model was used on 2,000 randomly selected patients to develop a multivariate scoring algorithm for the aforementioned factors to predict biochemical progression-free survival. The final model included Gleason score, preoperative PSA, margin status, seminal vesicle involvement and adjuvant treatment. The prognostic score derived from this model was validated by applying it to the remaining 518 patients. Harrell's measure of concordance (C) was used to compare competing models. Results: For patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy the derived score based on the Cox model coefficient was Gleason +1 (PSA 4 to 10), +2 (PSA 10.1 to 20), +3 (PSA greater than 20), +2 (positive seminal vesicle) and +2 (positive margin). The score was reduced by 4 if adjuvant hormonal therapy was given and by 2 for only adjuvant radiotherapy. The 5-year progression-free survival was 94% for scores less than 5, 60% for 10 and 32% for greater than 12 (C = 0.718). Applying the score to the independent validation data set (518) resulted in 5-year progression-free survival of 96% for scores less than 5, 53% for 10 and 30% for greater than 12 (C = 0.759). Conclusions: Progression-free survival determined by the model score group identified a wide range of risk levels for patients with specimen confined prostate cancer. This simple predictive model allows identification of patients at high risk for cancer progression with specimen confined disease who may be targeted for closer surveillance and adjuvant therapy, while those at lower risk may be simply observed.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 125
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Bauer JJ, 1997, CANCER, V79, P952, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970301)79:5<952::AID-CNCR12>3.3.CO
  • [2] 2-I
  • [3] Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Blute, ML
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Partin, AW
    Walsh, PC
    Kattan, MW
    Scardino, PT
    Montie, JE
    Pearson, JD
    Slezak, JM
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) : 1591 - 1595
  • [4] Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy
    Blute, ML
    Bostwick, DG
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Slezak, JM
    Martin, SK
    Amling, CL
    Zincke, H
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) : 733 - 739
  • [5] Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy
    Lange, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (01) : 177 - 178
  • [6] MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SERUM AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR PROSTATE-CANCER
    CATALONA, WJ
    SMITH, DS
    RATLIFF, TL
    DODDS, KM
    COPLEN, DE
    YUAN, JJJ
    PETROS, JA
    ANDRIOLE, GL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (17) : 1156 - 1161
  • [7] PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION IN A CLINICAL UROLOGICAL PRACTICE BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    COONER, WH
    MOSLEY, BR
    RUTHERFORD, CL
    BEARD, JH
    POND, HS
    TERRY, WJ
    IGEL, TC
    KIDD, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (06) : 1146 - 1154
  • [8] Outcome based staging for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate
    DAmico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Schultz, D
    Malkowicz, B
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Wein, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (04) : 1422 - 1426
  • [9] Hazard rates for progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Dillioglugil, O
    Leibman, BD
    Kattan, MW
    SealeHawkins, C
    Wheeler, TM
    Scardino, PT
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [10] Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor
    Epstein, JI
    Pound, CR
    Partin, AW
    Walsh, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (01) : 97 - 100