The German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire:: reliability, validity, responsiveness, and comparison with the Short Form 36 and Constant score -: a prospective evaluation of patients undergoing repair for rotator cuff tear

被引:17
作者
Böhm, TD
Kirschner, S
Köhler, M
Wollmerstedt, N
Walther, M
Matzer, M
Faller, H
König, A
机构
[1] Klin Eichert, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-73006 Goppingen, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Orthoped Surg, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Psychotherapy & Med Psychol, Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
constant score; effect size; German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire; prospective clinical trial; rotator cuff tear; Short Form 36;
D O I
10.1007/s00296-003-0423-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
In a prospective clinical trial, first the German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D) was tested for reliability, validity, and responsiveness in 23 patients with rotator cuff tears, and secondly the Short Form (SF)-36, and the Constant score were evaluated comparatively in 45 patients with rotator cuff tear undergoing open repair. Retest reliability was excellent for the functional index of the SMFA-D and satisfactory for the bother index. The SMFA-D showed good validity and responsiveness. All three instruments demonstrated significantly the positive effect of rotator cuff repair at 12-month follow-up. Using comparable scales, effect sizes were bigger with the SMFA-D than with the SF-36 and as big as the Constant score. Significant correlations of the SMFA-D indices with the SF-36 scales and the Constant score could be shown preoperatively. At 12-month follow-up, all correlations between SMFA-D indices, SF-36 scales, and Constant score function scales were still significant. We recommend use of the SMFA-D to assess changes in functional status concerning patients with rotator cuff tear undergoing open repair.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 93
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Ahrens W, 1998, MESSUNG SOZIODEMOGRA
[2]
[Anonymous], 1999, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V81A, P732
[3]
Measuring function of the shoulder - A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (06) :882-890
[4]
BOEHM TD, 1997, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V6, P194
[5]
BOEHM TD, 2002, SCHULTER, P90
[6]
Bullinger M., 1998, SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand - HandanweisungAufl
[7]
Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears - A prospective long-term study [J].
Cofield, RH ;
Parvizi, J ;
Hoffmeyer, PJ ;
Lanzer, WL ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Rowland, CM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (01) :71-77
[8]
A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[9]
Evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment [J].
Conboy, VB ;
Morris, RW ;
Kiss, J ;
Carr, AJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02) :229-232
[10]
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160