A systematic review of the association between factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene variant and intrauterine growth restriction

被引:91
作者
Howley, HEA
Walker, M
Rodger, MA
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
meta-analysis factor V Leiden; prothrombin gene variant; intrauterine growth restriction;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature of studies that examined the association between factor V Leiden and/or prothrombin gene variant and intrauterine growth restriction. Study design: This systematic review of studies assesses the association between factor V Leiden and/or prothrombin gene variant and intrauterine growth restriction. Results: Ten case-control studies fulfilled the selection criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There was a significant association between factor V Leiden and intrauterine growth restriction (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.5) and prothrombin gene variant and intrauterine growth restriction (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.0). Five cohort studies were identified in the systematic review; 3 studies were prospective (2 full publications), and 2 studies were retrospective (I full publication). Combining the 2 full publication prospective studies yields a summary relative risk of 0.99 (95% CL 0.5-1.9). Conclusion: This meta-analysis of case-control studies suggests that the factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene variant both confer an increased risk of giving birth to an intrauterine growth restricted infant, although this may be driven by small, poor-quality studies that demonstrated extreme associations. Large well-conducted prospective cohort studies are required to determine definitively whether an association between thrombophilia and intrauterine growth restriction is present. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 708
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Agorastos T, 2002, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V12, P267, DOI 10.1080/jmf.12.4.267.273
[2]   How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome? A systematic review [J].
Alfirevic, Z ;
Roberts, D ;
Martlew, V .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 101 (01) :6-14
[3]  
Arias F, 1998, J Matern Fetal Med, V7, P277
[4]  
BARKER DJP, 1989, LANCET, V2, P577
[5]   Fetal origins of cardiovascular disease [J].
Barker, DJP .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1999, 31 :3-6
[6]   PUBLICATION BIAS AND DISSEMINATION OF CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
BEGG, CB ;
BERLIN, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (02) :107-115
[7]   Obstetric implications of the factor V Leiden mutation: A review [J].
Bloomenthal, D ;
Delisle, MF ;
Tessier, F ;
Tsang, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2002, 19 (01) :37-47
[8]  
Bloomenthal D, 2002, CAN MED ASSOC J, V167, P48
[9]   Inherited thrombophilia and poor pregnancy outcome [J].
Brenner, B ;
Kupferminc, MJ .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 17 (03) :427-439
[10]   Thrombophilia and pregnancy loss [J].
Brenner, B .
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2002, 108 (04) :197-202