The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education

被引:836
作者
Scherer, Ronny [1 ,2 ]
Siddiq, Fazilat [3 ]
Tondeur, Jo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Fac Educ Sci, Dept Teacher Educ & Sch Res ILS, Postbox 1099 Blindern, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Educ Sci, Ctr Educ Measurement, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway USN, Drammen, Norway
[4] Vrije Univ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Meta-analysis; Teacher education; Technology acceptance model (TAM); Technology adoption; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; GOODNESS-OF-FIT; PRESERVICE TEACHERS; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; USER ACCEPTANCE; RESEARCH AGENDA; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The extent to which teachers adopt technology in their teaching practice has long been in the focus of research. Indeed, a plethora of models exist explaining influential factors and mechanisms of technology use in classrooms, one of which the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and versions thereof has dominated the field. Although consensus exists about which factors in the TAM might predict teachers' technology adoption, the current field abounds in some controversies and inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis seeks to clarify some of these issues by combining meta-analysis with structural equation modeling approaches. Specifically, we synthesized 124 correlation matrices from 114 empirical TAM studies (N = 34,357 teachers) and tested the fit of the TAM and its versions. Overall, the TAM explains technology acceptance well; yet, the role of certain key constructs and the importance of external variables contrast some existing beliefs about the TAM. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 35
页数:23
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors [J].
Abdullah, Fazil ;
Ward, Rupert .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 56 :238-256
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review [J].
Al-Emran, Mostafa ;
Mezhuyev, Vitaliy ;
Kamaludin, Adzhar .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 125 :389-412
[4]   Inaccuracy of regression results in replacing bivariate correlations [J].
Aloe, Ariel M. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2015, 6 (01) :21-27
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INT STAT REV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J TEKNOLOGI SCI ENG, DOI DOI 10.11113/JT.V69.3101
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1985, TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANC
[8]   Teachers' beliefs about learning from multimedia [J].
Antonietti, A ;
Giorgetti, M .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2006, 22 (02) :267-282
[9]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[10]  
Baturay MH, 2017, INT J TECHNOL ENHANC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJTEL.2017.10003119