Effect of conversion from a fee-for-service plan to a capitation reimbursement system on a circumscribed outpatient radiology practice of 20,000 persons

被引:13
作者
Kangarloo, H
Ho, BKT
Lufkin, RB
Barbaric, Z
Kirlew, K
Yaghmai, S
Scholem, D
Steckel, RJ
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,BOSTON,MA 02114
[2] MED TECHNOL TRANSFER CORP,LOS ANGELES,CA
[3] HARRIS CORP,MELBOURNE,FL 32919
关键词
cost-effectiveness; diagnostic radiology; radiology and radiologists; socioeconomic issues; teleradiology;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816525
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of a capitation reimbursement plan with attendant changes in service arrangements on the utilization of radiologic services, financially on the payer, and on the satisfaction of patients and referring physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outpatient radiologic services for a defined population of 20,000 company employees and their dependents were converted from a point-of-service managed care plan to a capitation payment plan. Under the capitation plan, nonemergent outpatient diagnostic imaging was performed at a newly constructed imaging center staffed by general radiologists. All cross-sectional images and certain projectional studies were also over-read (read again after the initial reading by local radiologists) by subspecialists. Utilization data obtained before and after the conversion were analyzed. The financial effect on the employer and the satisfaction of patients and physicians were also assessed. RESULTS: Quality imaging services were provided under the capitation plan with financial savings by the employer. Use was higher for crosssectional imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging studies, and was lower for nonmammographic plain radiography. Consumer satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION Under certain conditions, conversion to a capitation system for imaging can lead to improved quality of care and decreased overall health-care costs.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 84
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
BALDOR RA, 1993, J FAM PRACTICE, V36, P281
[2]   TECHNOLOGY - THE KEY TO CONTROLLING HEALTH-CARE COSTS IN THE FUTURE [J].
GIBSON, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (06) :1289-1293
[3]   FREQUENCY AND COSTS OF DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING IN OFFICE PRACTICE - A COMPARISON OF SELF-REFERRING AND RADIOLOGIST-REFERRING PHYSICIANS [J].
HILLMAN, BJ ;
JOSEPH, CA ;
MABRY, MR ;
SUNSHINE, JH ;
KENNEDY, SD ;
NOETHER, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (23) :1604-1608
[4]   PHYSICIANS UTILIZATION AND CHARGES FOR OUTPATIENT DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING IN A MEDICARE POPULATION [J].
HILLMAN, BJ ;
OLSON, GT ;
GRIFFITH, PE ;
SUNSHINE, JH ;
JOSEPH, CA ;
KENNEDY, SD ;
NELSON, WR ;
BERNHARDT, LB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (15) :2050-2054
[5]   CONSEQUENCES OF PHYSICIANS OWNERSHIP OF HEALTH-CARE FACILITIES - JOINT VENTURES IN RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
MITCHELL, JM ;
SUNSHINE, JH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (21) :1497-1501
[6]   THE RADIOLOGIST AS A PRIMARY-CARE EXTENDER [J].
ROGERS, LF ;
POTCHEN, EJ ;
MAYNARD, CD .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (01) :19-22
[7]   THE INEVITABLE FAILURE OF CURRENT COST-CONTAINMENT STRATEGIES - WHY THEY CAN PROVIDE ONLY TEMPORARY RELIEF [J].
SCHWARTZ, WB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 257 (02) :220-224