The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States

被引:87
作者
Garrick, Dorian J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Massey Univ, Inst Vet Anim & Biomed Sci, Palmerston North, New Zealand
基金
美国农业部; 美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; GENETIC EVALUATION; BREEDING VALUES; FULL PEDIGREE; INFORMATION; ACCURACY; DERIVATION; CARCASS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/1297-9686-43-17
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Artificial selection has proven to be effective at altering the performance of animal production systems. Nevertheless, selection based on assessment of the genetic superiority of candidates is suboptimal as a result of errors in the prediction of genetic merit. Conventional breeding programs may extend phenotypic measurements on selection candidates to include correlated indicator traits, or delay selection decisions well beyond puberty so that phenotypic performance can be observed on progeny or other relatives. Extending the generation interval to increase the accuracy of selection reduces annual rates of gain compared to accurate selection and use of parents of the next generation at the immediate time they reach breeding age. Genomic prediction aims at reducing prediction errors at breeding age by exploiting information on the transmission of chromosome fragments from parents to selection candidates, in conjunction with knowledge on the value of every chromosome fragment. For genomic prediction to influence beef cattle breeding programs and the rate or cost of genetic gains, training analyses must be undertaken, and genomic prediction tools made available for breeders and other industry stakeholders. This paper reviews the nature or kind of studies currently underway, the scope or extent of some of those studies, and comments on the likely predictive value of genomic information for beef cattle improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Johnson, D. L. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) :743-752
[2]  
*AM ANG ASS, BUS BREED
[3]  
BRIGHAM BW, GENETICS DIS RESISTA
[4]  
*COOP RES INT, GEN MARK PFIZ HD 50
[5]   Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Villanueva, Beatriz ;
Woolliams, John A. .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (10)
[6]   MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION USING BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION [J].
FERNANDO, RL ;
GROSSMAN, M .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1989, 21 (04) :467-477
[7]   Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today [J].
Garrick, D. J. ;
Golden, B. L. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 87 (14) :E11-E18
[8]  
GARRICK DJ, 2009, P BEEF IMPR FED 41 A, V41, P92
[9]   Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses [J].
Garrick, Dorian J. ;
Taylor, Jeremy F. ;
Fernando, Rohan L. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2009, 41
[10]  
GEORGES M, 1995, GENETICS, V139, P907