Estimation and mapping of forest stand density, volume, and cover type using the k-nearest neighbors method

被引:358
作者
Franco-Lopez, H
Ek, AR
Bauer, ME
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Antonio Narro, Dept Forest Resources, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico
关键词
forest inventory; k-nearest neighbors; estimation;
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00209-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mapping forest variables and associated characteristics is fundamental for forest planning and management. Considerable effort has been made in Northern Europe to develop techniques for wall-to-wall mapping of forest variables. Following that work, we describe the k-nearest neighbors (kNN) method for improving estimation and to produce wall-to-wall basal area, volume, and cover type maps, in the context of the USDA Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) monitoring system. Several variations within the kNN were tested, including: distance metric, weighting function, feature weighting parameters, and number of neighbors. Specific procedures to incorporate ancillary information and image enhancement techniques were also tested. Using the nearest neighbor (k = 1), Euclidean distance, a three date 18-band composite image, and feature weighting parameters, maps were constructed for basal area, volume, and cover type. The empirical, bootstrap based, 95% confidence interval for the basal area root mean square error (MSE) is (8.21, 9.02) m(2)/ha and for volume (48.68, 54.58) m(3)/ha. For the 13 FIA forest cover type classes, results indicated useful map accuracy and the choice of k = 1 retained the full range of forest types present in the region. The 95% confidence interval, obtained using the bootstrap 0.632+ technique, for the overall accuracy (OA) in the 13 cover type classification was (0.4952, 0.5459). Recommendations for applying the kNN method for mapping and regional estimation are provided. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc, All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 274
页数:24
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ALBERT DA, 1995, NC178 N CENTR FOR EX
[2]  
BAUER ME, 1994, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V60, P287
[3]  
BIRDSEY RA, 1992, RM214 USDA ROCK MOUN
[4]  
BURK TE, 1990, B 1927, P81
[5]   A REVIEW OF ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF CLASSIFICATIONS OF REMOTELY SENSED DATA [J].
CONGALTON, RG .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 37 (01) :35-46
[6]  
COPPIN PR, 1994, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V60, P287
[7]  
CZAPLEWSKI RL, 1995, UNPUB PROBLEM ANAL A
[8]  
DEEGAN G, 1990, US FOR SERV T R PNW, V263, P318
[9]   Improvements on cross-validation: The .632+ bootstrap method [J].
Efron, B ;
Tibshirani, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 92 (438) :548-560