Recycling revisited -: life cycle comparisons of global warming impact and total energy use of waste management strategies

被引:131
作者
Björklund, A
Finnveden, G
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, Ctr Environm Strategies Res, FMS, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Swedish Def Res Agcy, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
life cycle assessment; waste; recycling; incineration; landfill; key factor; energy; global warming potential;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.12.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recycling of waste materials has been analysed from a life cycle perspective in a number of studies over the past 10-15 years. Publications comparing the global warming impact and total energy use of recycling versus incineration and landfilling were reviewed in order to find out to what extent they agree or contradict each other, and whether there are generally applicable conclusions to be drawn when certain key factors are considered. Four key factors with a significant influence on the ranking between recycling, incineration, and landfilling were identified. Producing materials from recycled resources is often, but not always, less energy intensive and causes less global warming impact than from virgin resources. For non-renewable materials the savings are of such a magnitude, that apparently the only really crucial factor is what material is replaced. For paper products, however, the savings of recycling are much smaller. The ranking between recycling and incineration of paper is sensitive to for instance paper quality, energy source avoided by incineration, and energy source at the mill. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.v. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 317
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 14041 ISO
[2]   Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system [J].
Arena, U ;
Mastellone, ML ;
Perugini, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (02) :92-98
[3]  
BJORKLUND A, 2002, P 10 SETAC LCA CAS S
[4]   The application of Life Cycle Assessment to Integrated Solid Waste Management - Part 1 - Methodology [J].
Clift, R ;
Doig, A ;
Finnveden, G .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2000, 78 (B4) :279-287
[5]   Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: A case study [J].
Craighill, AL ;
Powell, JC .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1996, 17 (02) :75-96
[6]  
Edwards DW, 1996, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V74, P205
[7]   Municipal waste life cycle assessment - Part 2: Transport analysis and glass case study [J].
Edwards, DW ;
Schelling, J .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 1999, 77 (B5) :259-274
[8]  
Ekvall T., 2001, J CLEAN PROD, V9, P197, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4
[9]   Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective [J].
Eriksson, O ;
Reich, MC ;
Frostell, B ;
Björklund, A ;
Assefa, G ;
Sundqvist, JO ;
Granath, J ;
Baky, A ;
Thyselius, L .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (03) :241-252
[10]   Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool - the case of recycling versus incineration of paper [J].
Finnveden, G ;
Ekvall, T .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1998, 24 (3-4) :235-256