The implications of the historical decline in US energy intensity for long-run CO2 emission projections

被引:44
作者
Wing, Ian Sue
Eckaus, Richard S.
机构
[1] MIT, Ctr Energy & Environm Studies, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] MIT, Joint Program Sci & Policy Global Change, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] MIT, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
autonomous energy efficiency improvement; CGE models; Climate change policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the influence of the long-run decline in US energy intensity on projections of energy use and carbon emissions to the year 2050. We build on our own recent work which decomposes changes in the aggregate US energy-GDP ratio into shifts in sectoral composition (structural change) and adjustments in the energy demand of individual industries (intensity change), and identifies the impact on the latter of price-induced substitution of variable inputs, shifts in the composition of capital and embodied and disembodied technical progress. We employ a recursive-dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the US economy to analyze the implications of these findings for future energy use and carbon emissions. Comparison of the simulation results against projections of historical trends in GDP, energy use and emissions reveals that the range of values for the rate of autonomous energy efficiency improvement (AEEI) conventionally used in CGE models is consistent with the effects of structural changes at the sub-sector level, rather than disembodied technological change. Even so, our results suggest that US emissions may well grow faster in the future than in the recent past. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5267 / 5286
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MIT EMISSIONS PREDIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY J
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, TRENDS COMPENDIUM DA
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT COMPARISONS PROD
[5]  
ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
[6]   Global impacts of the Kyoto agreement: results from the MS-MRT model [J].
Bernstein, PM ;
Montgomery, WD ;
Rutherford, TF .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (3-4) :375-413
[7]  
Bovenberg AL, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P985
[8]  
Boyd GA, 2004, ENERGY J, V25, P87
[9]  
Brooke A., 1998, USERS GUIDE
[10]   US energy product supply elasticities: A survey and application to the US oil market [J].
Dahl, C ;
Duggan, TE .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) :243-263