Contact rates between wild and domestic canids: no evidence of parvovirus or canine distemper virus in crab-eating foxes

被引:42
作者
Courtenay, O [1 ]
Quinnell, RJ
Chalmers, WSK
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Biol Sci, Ecol & Epidemiol Grp, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Biol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Intervet UK Ltd, Huntingdon PE17 2BQ, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
parvovirus; distemper virus; wildlife disease; contact rates; transmission; fox; Cerdocyon thous; dog; reservoir;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00326-1
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Evaluating the risk of disease spill-over from domestic dogs to wildlife depends on knowledge of inter-specific contact rates and/or exposure to aetiological agents in dog environments. Here, contact rates of crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous) with sympatric domestic dog populations were measured over 25 months in Amazon Brazil. Foxes and dogs were serologically and clinically monitored for exposure to canine parvovirus (CPV-2) and canine distemper virus (CDV), pathogens known to have caused wildlife population declines elsewhere. Twenty-two of 24 (92%) tagged foxes visited one or more houses in a median 2 (range 1-3) villages per night where dog densities ranged from 7.2 to 15.4 per km(2) (mean 9.5 per km(2)). Foxes spent an average 6.4% (0-40.3%) of their 10 h nocturnal activity period in villages, the equivalent of 38 m (range 0-242) per night. The rate of potential exposure to disease agents was thus high, though varied by 3 orders of magnitude for individual foxes. Overall, 46% of the fox population was responsible for 80% of all contacts. None of the 37 monitored foxes however showed serological or clinical evidence of infection with CPV-2 or CDV. Seroprevalences for CPV-2 and CDV antibodies in the local domestic dog population were 13% (3/23) and 9% (2/23), respectively. and 89% of 97 monitored pups born during the study presented clinical signs consistent with active CPV-2 infection (haemorrhagic diarrhoea, vomiting, rapid morbidity and emaciation). Although there was no evidence for infection with either virus in foxes, the high level of contact of foxes with peridomestic habitats suggests that the probability of potential spill-over infections from dogs to foxes is high. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 19
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Alexander KA, 1996, J ZOO WILDLIFE MED, V27, P426
[2]   SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF SELECTED CANINE PATHOGENS AMONG FREE-RANGING JACKALS IN KENYA [J].
ALEXANDER, KA ;
KAT, PW ;
WAYNE, RK ;
FULLER, TK .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1994, 30 (04) :486-491
[3]  
Appel M.J., 1987, VIRUS INFECT CARNIVO, P133
[4]  
Appel MJ, 1987, VIRUS INFECTIONS CAR, P69
[5]   ANTIBODIES TO CANINE-DISTEMPER VIRUS IN ANTARCTIC SEALS [J].
BENGTSON, JL ;
BOVENG, P ;
FRANZEN, U ;
HAVE, P ;
HEIDEJORGENSEN, MP ;
HARKONEN, TJ .
MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 7 (01) :85-87
[6]  
Bingham J, 1999, ONDERSTEPOORT J VET, V66, P11
[7]   STUDIES ON MANIFESTATIONS OF CANINE-DISTEMPER VIRUS-INFECTION IN AN URBAN DOG-POPULATION [J].
BLIXENKRONEMOLLER, M ;
SVANSSON, V ;
HAVE, P ;
ORVELL, C ;
APPEL, M ;
PEDERSEN, IR ;
DIETZ, HH ;
HENRIKSEN, P .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 37 (1-2) :163-173
[8]  
BRAND CJ, 1995, ECOLOGY CONSERVATION, V35, P419
[9]   CONTROL OF CANINE-DISTEMPER [J].
CHAPPUIS, G .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 44 (2-4) :351-358
[10]   A POTENCY TEST FOR INACTIVATED SMALL ANIMAL PARVOVIRUS VACCINES USING CHICKS [J].
CHURCHILL, AE .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION, 1982, 10 (01) :1-8