WHAT CAN AND SHOULD BE LEGALIZED IN ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION?

被引:9
作者
Aronson, James [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, UMR 5175, F-34293 Montpellier, France
[2] Missouri Bot Garden, St Louis, MO USA
来源
REVISTA ARVORE | 2010年 / 34卷 / 03期
关键词
legal instruments; restoration decision making and restoration cost-effectiveness; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-67622010000300009
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
After listing the five key elements of ecological restoration, ecology, economics, social values, cultural values, and politics, I celebrate the fact that in Brazil there is legislation on how to perform ecological restoration of degraded tropical forests, as well as an ongoing dialogue among legislators and scientists about this legislation, and also a lively debate among scientists as the best way forward, referring to articles by Brancalion et al. (2010) and Durigan et al. (2010) in this issue of Revista Arvore. Legislators elsewhere, especially megadiversity countries, should take note. 1 do not take sides in the debate; I think both groups of authors make very good points. Instead I call on the scientists and legislators concerned with restoration to ponder five strategic tools: A. Start with clear concepts. B. Decide where you want to go and why. C. Negotiate who should benefit & how, and who should pay, how, & why. D. Work out how an honest cost-benefit analysis of restoration would look, regardless of the biome in which you are working. Finally, figure out how to make the restoration immediately attractive for private landowners. Otherwise, they will not cooperate as fully as they could or should, and restoration efforts will not achieve its full potential.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 454
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SER INT PRIM EC REST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[3]  
Aronson J., 2007, Restoring natural capital: Science, business, and practice
[4]   Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta-analysis of Recent Papers (2000-2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals [J].
Aronson, James ;
Blignaut, James N. ;
Milton, Suzanne J. ;
Le Maitre, David ;
Esler, Karen J. ;
Limouzin, Amandine ;
Fontaine, Christelle ;
de Wit, Martin P. ;
Mugido, Worship ;
Prinsloo, Philip ;
van der Elst, Leandri ;
Lederer, Ned .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2010, 18 (02) :143-154
[5]   LEGAL INSTRUMENTS CAN ENHANCE HIGH-DIVERSITY TROPICAL FOREST RESTORATION [J].
Brancalion, Pedro Henrique S. ;
Rodrigues, Ricardo Ribeiro ;
Gandolfi, Sergius ;
Kageyama, Paulo Yoshio ;
Nave, Andre Gustavo ;
Gandara, Flavio Bertin ;
Barbosa, Luiz Mauro ;
Tabarelli, Marcelo .
REVISTA ARVORE, 2010, 34 (03) :455-470
[6]  
CAIRNS J, 1993, NATURE CONSERVATION, V3, P193
[7]   Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems [J].
Clewell, AF ;
Aronson, J .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) :420-428
[8]  
Clewell Andre., 2007, ECOLOGICAL RESTORATI
[9]   LEGAL RULES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION: AN ADDITIONAL BARRIER TO HINDER THE SUCCESS OF INITIATIVES? [J].
Durigan, Giselda ;
Engel, Vera Lex ;
Torezan, Jose Marcelo ;
Galvao de Melo, Antonio Carlos ;
Mendes Marques, Marcia Cristina ;
Martins, Sebastiao Venancio ;
Reis, Ademir ;
Scarano, Fabio Rubio .
REVISTA ARVORE, 2010, 34 (03) :471-485
[10]   Using return-on-investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii [J].
Goldstein, Joshua H. ;
Pejchar, Liba ;
Daily, Gretchen C. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2008, 1 (05) :236-243