Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms

被引:200
作者
Kupinski, MA [1 ]
Giger, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Kurt Rossmann Labs Radiol Image Res, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
computer-aided diagnosis; digital mammography; lesion segmentation; mass detection;
D O I
10.1109/42.730396
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Segmenting lesions is a vital step in many computerized mass-detection schemes for digital (or digitized) mammograms, We have developed two novel lesion segmentation techniques-one based on a single feature called the radial gradient index (RGI) and one based an simple probabilistic models to segment mass lesions, or other similar nodular structures, from surrounding background, In both methods a series of image partitions is created using gray-level information as well as prior knowledge of the shape of typical mass lesions, With the former method the partition that maximizes the RGI is selected. In the latter method, probability distributions for gray-levels inside and outside the partitions are estimated, and subsequently used to determine the probability that the image occurred for each given partition, The partition that maximizes this probability is selected as the final lesion partition (contour), We tested these methods against a conventional region growing algorithm using a database of biopsy-proven, malignant lesions and found that the new lesion segmentation algorithms more closely match radiologists' outlines of these lesions, At an overlap threshold of 0.30, gray level region growing correctly delineates 62% of the lesions in our database while the RGI and probabilistic segmentation algorithms correctly segment 92% and 96% of the lesions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 517
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT C SERIES
[2]  
BICK U, 1995, P CAR 95, P357
[3]   AN INTELLIGENT WORKSTATION FOR COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS [J].
GIGER, ML ;
DOI, K ;
MACMAHON, H ;
NISHIKAWA, RM ;
HOFFMANN, KR ;
VYBORNY, CJ ;
SCHMIDT, RA ;
JIA, H ;
ABE, K ;
CHEN, X ;
KANO, A ;
KATSURAGAWA, S ;
YIN, FF ;
ALPERIN, N ;
METZ, CE ;
BEHLEN, FM ;
SLUIS, D .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1993, 13 (03) :647-656
[4]  
GIGER ML, 1991, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1445, P101, DOI 10.1117/12.45207
[5]  
GIGER ML, 1996, INT C SERIES, P53
[6]  
Hastie T., 1990, Generalized additive model
[7]   ANALYSIS OF SPICULATION IN THE COMPUTERIZED CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC MASSES [J].
HUO, ZM ;
GIGER, ML ;
VYBORNY, CJ ;
BICK, U ;
LU, P ;
WOLVERTON, DE ;
SCHMIDT, RA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1569-1579
[8]  
KUPINSKI M, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2434, P598, DOI 10.1117/12.208759
[9]   MARKOV RANDOM-FIELD FOR TUMOR-DETECTION IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
LI, HD ;
KALLERGI, M ;
CLARKE, LP ;
JAIN, VK ;
CLARK, RA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1995, 14 (03) :565-576
[10]   IMAGE FEATURE ANALYSIS OF FALSE-POSITIVE DIAGNOSES PRODUCED BY AUTOMATED DETECTION OF LUNG NODULES [J].
MATSUMOTO, T ;
YOSHIMURA, H ;
DOI, K ;
GIGER, ML ;
KANO, A ;
MACMAHON, H ;
ABE, K ;
MONTNER, SM .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (08) :587-597