The determinants of positive long-term performance in strategic mergers: Corporate focus and cash

被引:57
作者
Megginson, WL
Morgan, A
Nail, L
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Finance, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Michael F Price Coll Business, Rainbelt Chair Finance, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Clemson Univ, Dept Finance, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
corporate focus; corporate diversification; mergers; acquisitions post-merger performance;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00412-0
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Using a sample selection and benchmarking methodology designed to more accurately assess merger-related changes in corporate focus, we find a significantly positive relationship between corporate focus and long-term merger performance. Focus-decreasing (FD) mergers result in significantly negative long-term performance with an average 18% loss in stockholder wealth. 9% loss in firm value, and significant declines in operating cash flows three years after merger. Mergers that either preserve or increase focus (FPI) result in marginal improvements in long-term performance. These results are consistent with many corporate focus studies, suggesting that merger studies finding opposite results are the result of measurement error. A positive relationship between changes in focus and long-term performance continues to hold after controlling for other variables. A continuous measure of focus change indicates that the extent of focus changes is significant. Every 10% reduction in focus results in a 9% loss in stockholder wealth, a 4% discount in firm value, and a more than 1% decline in operating performance. Cash-financed FPI mergers exhibit the best, and stock-financed FD mergers the worst, long-term performance. Tests of subsample time periods show that the focus change measure is significant in both time periods, indicating that the extent of corporate focus changes is the more important measure of corporate focus or diversification. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 552
页数:30
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Acar W, 1999, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V20, P969, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<969::AID-SMJ57>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-0
[3]   THE POST-MERGER PERFORMANCE OF ACQUIRING FIRMS - A REEXAMINATION OF AN ANOMALY [J].
AGRAWAL, A ;
JAFFE, JF ;
MANDELKER, GN .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1992, 47 (04) :1605-1621
[4]   Can takeover losses explain spin-off gains? [J].
Allen, JW ;
Lummer, SI ;
McConnell, JJ ;
Reed, DK .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1995, 30 (04) :465-485
[5]   THE GAINS TO BIDDING FIRMS FROM MERGER [J].
ASQUITH, P ;
BRUNER, RF ;
MULLINS, DW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1983, 11 (1-4) :121-139
[6]   Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics [J].
Barber, BM ;
Lyon, JD .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 43 (03) :341-372
[7]   Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics [J].
Barber, BM ;
Lyon, JD .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 41 (03) :359-399
[8]   DIVERSIFICATIONS EFFECT ON FIRM VALUE [J].
BERGER, PG ;
OFEK, E .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (01) :39-65
[9]  
BERGMANN R, 1996, IN VITRO HAPLOID PRO, V5, P1
[10]  
BHAGAT S, 1990, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1