The redox state of the plastoquinone pool controls the level of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein complex II (LHC II) during photoacclimation -: Cytochrome b6f deficient Lemna perpusilla plants are locked in a state of high-light acclimation

被引:71
作者
Yang, DH
Andersson, B
Aro, EM
Ohad, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Biol Chem, Ctr Photosynth Res, IL-91904 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Univ Stockholm, Arrhenius Labs Nat Sci, Dept Biochem & Biophys, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Div Cell Biol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Biol, Turku 20014, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
cytochrome b(6)f complex; Lemna perpusilla; LHC II; photoacclimation; plastoquinone pool; redox state;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011849919438
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
A cytochrome bf deficient mutant of Lemna perpusilla maintains a constant and lower level of the light-harvesting chl a/b-binding protein complex II (LHC II) as compared to the wild type plants at low-light intensities. Inhibition of the plastoquinone pool reduction increases the LHC II content of the mutant at both low- and high-light intensities but only at high-light intensity in the wild type plants. Proteolytic activity against LHC II appears during high-light photoacclimation of wild type plants. However, the acclimative protease is present in the mutant at both light intensities. These and additional results suggest that the plastoquinone redox state serves as the major signal-transducing component in the photoacclimation process affecting both, synthesis and degradation of LHC II and appearance of acclimative LHC II proteolysis. The plastoquinol pool cannot be oxidized by linear electron flow in the mutant plants which are locked in a `high light' acclimation state. The cytochrome bf complex may be involved indirectly in the regulation of photoacclimation via 1) regulation of the plastoquinone redox state; 2) regulation of the redox-controlled thylakoid protein kinase allowing exposure of the dephosphorylated LHC II to acclimative proteolysis.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 174
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Redox signalling and the structural basis of regulation of photosynthesis by protein phosphorylation [J].
Allen, JF ;
Nilsson, A .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1997, 100 (04) :863-868
[2]   THE DYNAMIC PHOTOSYNTHETIC MEMBRANE AND REGULATION OF SOLAR-ENERGY CONVERSION [J].
ANDERSON, JM ;
ANDERSSON, B .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1988, 13 (09) :351-355
[3]   The grand design of photosynthesis: Acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to environmental cues [J].
Anderson, JM ;
Chow, WS ;
Park, YI .
PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH, 1995, 46 (1-2) :129-139
[4]   PHOTOREGULATION OF THE COMPOSITION, FUNCTION, AND STRUCTURE OF THYLAKOID MEMBRANES [J].
ANDERSON, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1986, 37 :93-136
[5]   Reduced levels of cytochrome bf complex in transgenic tobacco leads to marked photochemical reduction of the plastoquinone pool, without significant change in acclimation to irradiance [J].
Anderson, JM ;
Price, GD ;
Chow, WS ;
Hope, AB ;
Badger, MR .
PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH, 1997, 53 (2-3) :215-227
[6]   SEPARATION OF SUBCHLOROPLAST MEMBRANE PARTICLES BY COUNTERCURRENT DISTRIBUTION [J].
ANDERSSON, B ;
AKERLUND, HE ;
ALBERTSSON, PA .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1976, 423 (01) :122-132
[7]   RECOVERY FROM PHOTOINHIBITION IN PEAS (PISUM-SATIVUM L) ACCLIMATED TO VARYING GROWTH IRRADIANCES - ROLE OF D1 PROTEIN-TURNOVER [J].
ARO, EM ;
MCCAFFERY, S ;
ANDERSON, JM .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 104 (03) :1033-1041
[8]   Photoinhibitory damage is modulated by the rate of photosynthesis and by the photosystem II light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna size [J].
Baroli, I ;
Melis, A .
PLANTA, 1998, 205 (02) :288-296
[9]   CYTOCHROME-B6F COMPLEX IS REQUIRED FOR PHOSPHORYLATION OF LIGHT-HARVESTING CHLOROPHYLL A/B COMPLEX-II IN CHLOROPLAST PHOTOSYNTHETIC MEMBRANES [J].
BENNETT, J ;
SHAW, EK ;
MICHEL, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 171 (1-2) :95-100
[10]   PROTEIN-PHOSPHORYLATION IN GREEN PLANT CHLOROPLASTS [J].
BENNETT, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1991, 42 :281-311