Network decomposition-based benchmark results for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem

被引:71
作者
Akkan, C [1 ]
Drexl, A
Kimms, A
机构
[1] Sabanci Univ, Grad Sch Management, TR-34956 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Betriebswirtschaftslehre, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] Tech Univ, Bergakad Freiberg, Fak Wirtschaftswissensch, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany
关键词
project scheduling; activity network; time-cost tradeoff; network decomposition; column generation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In project management, the project duration can often be compressed by accelerating some of its activities at an additional expense. This is the so-called time-cost tradeoff problem which has been extensively studied in the past. However, the discrete version of the problem which is of great practical relevance, did not receive much attention so far. Given a set of modes (time-cost pairs) for each activity, the objective of the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem is to select a mode for each activity so that the total cost is minimized while meeting a given project deadline. The discrete time-cost tradeoff problem is a strongly NP-hard optimization problem for general activity networks. In terms of what current state-of-art algorithms can do, instances with (depending on the structure of the network and the number of processing alternatives per activity) no more than 20-50 activities can be solved to optimality in reasonable amount of time. Hence, heuristics must be employed to solve larger instances. To evaluate such heuristics, lower bounds are needed. This paper provides lower and upper bounds using column generation techniques based on "network decomposition". Furthermore, a computational study is provided to demonstrate that the presented bounds are tight and that large and hard instances can be solved in short run-time. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 358
页数:20
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Generating two-terminal directed acyclic graphs with a given complexity index by constraint logic programming [J].
Akkan, C ;
Drexl, A ;
Kimms, A .
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND ALGEBRAIC PROGRAMMING, 2005, 62 (01) :1-39
[2]  
AKKAN C, 1999, ITERATED LOCAL SEARC
[3]  
Akkan C, 1998, WORKING PAPER
[4]  
[Anonymous], REV FRANCAISE RECHER
[5]   OPTIMAL REDUCTION OF 2-TERMINAL DIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPHS [J].
BEIN, WW ;
KAMBUROWSKI, J ;
STALLMANN, MFM .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1992, 21 (06) :1112-1129
[6]   Complexity of the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem for project networks [J].
De, P ;
Dunne, EJ ;
Ghosh, JB ;
Wells, CE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 45 (02) :302-306
[7]   THE DISCRETE TIME-COST TRADEOFF PROBLEM REVISITED [J].
DE, P ;
DUNNE, EJ ;
GHOSH, JB ;
WELLS, CE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 81 (02) :225-238
[8]   Hardness of approximation of the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem [J].
Deineko, VG ;
Woeginger, GJ .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 29 (05) :207-210
[9]   Optimal procedures for the discrete time cost trade-off problem in project networks [J].
Demeulemeester, EL ;
Herroelen, WS ;
Elmaghraby, SE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 88 (01) :50-68
[10]  
FRANK H, 1970, NETWORKS, V1, P43