Cue reactivity in dependent amphetamine users: can monistic conditioning theories advance our understanding of reactivity?

被引:4
作者
Topp, L [1 ]
Lovibond, PF
Mattick, RP
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Natl Drug & Alcohol Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
amphetamine; cue reactivity; craving; amphetamine symptoms; amphetamine withdrawal; conditioning;
D O I
10.1080/09595239800187111
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Forty-eight dependent injecting amphetamine users (AUs) and 48 controls were exposed to an amphetamine-related video and three affective control videos, and their amphetamine-related responses (amphetamine symptoms, withdrawal symptoms, and for AUs, "positive" and "negative" craving, based on the desire for positive and negative reinforcement, respectively) were recorded after each one, Both groups responded to the amphetamine video with increased withdrawal symptoms relative to control videos, suggesting that drug-related cues have significant unconditioned aversive properties. Between-group differences in amphetamine symptoms were evident only after the amphetamine video, supporting a conditioned drug agonistic model of cue reactivity, Among AUs, both positive and negative craving increased significantly after the amphetamine video, providing prima facie evidence for both conditioned withdrawal and conditioned drug agonistic accounts of cue reactivity. However, the lack of consistent and strong correlations between the two types of craving and the affective states hypothesized to induce such craving cannot be accommodated by the dominant models of the role of conditioning in maintaining addictive behaviours, This suggests a need to build upon theories of cue reactivity which predict conditioned responses to be either drug-like or drug-opposite.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 288
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, COMP INT DIAGN INT V
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Addictive Behaviour: cue exposure theory and practice
[3]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDERS AND NONRESPONDERS TO COCAINE CUES IN THE LABORATORY [J].
AVANTS, SK ;
MARGOLIN, A ;
KOSTEN, TR ;
COONEY, NL .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1995, 20 (02) :215-224
[4]   ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY AND MOOD IN COCAINE-DEPENDENT OUTPATIENTS - EFFECTS OF COCAINE CUE EXPOSURE [J].
BAUER, LO ;
KRANZLER, HR .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 36 (03) :189-197
[5]   Haloperidol antagonism of cue-elicited cocaine craving [J].
Berger, SP ;
Hall, S ;
Mickalian, JD ;
Reid, MS ;
Crawford, CA ;
Delucchi, K ;
Carr, K ;
Hall, S .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9000) :504-508
[6]   THE MIND OF AN ADDICTED BRAIN - NEURAL SENSITIZATION OF WANTING VERSUS LIKING [J].
BERRIDGE, KC ;
ROBINSON, TE .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 4 (03) :71-76
[7]   SIMULTANEOUS CONTRAST TESTING PROCEDURES FOR MULTIVARIATE EXPERIMENTS [J].
BIRD, KD .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1975, 10 (03) :343-351
[8]  
*COMM DEP HLTH FAM, 1996, NAT DRUG STRAT HOUS
[9]   LEVELS AND CORRELATES OF POLYDRUG USE AMONG HEROIN USERS AND REGULAR AMPHETAMINE USERS [J].
DARKE, S ;
HALL, W .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1995, 39 (03) :231-235
[10]   Characteristics of admissions to residential drug treatment agencies in New South Wales, 1988-92 .1. Illicit drug problems [J].
Darke, S ;
Kelaher, M ;
Hall, W ;
Flaherty, B .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 1996, 15 (02) :127-132