The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury

被引:138
作者
Defrin, Ruth [1 ]
Grunhaus, Leon [2 ,5 ]
Zamir, Doron [1 ]
Zeilig, Gabi [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Dept Phys Therapy, IL-69978 Ramat Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Ramat Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Dept Neurol Rehabil, Ramat Aviv, Israel
[4] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[5] Jerusalem Mental Hlth Ctr, Jerusalem, Israel
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2007年 / 88卷 / 12期
关键词
pain; rehabilitation; spinal cord injuries;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.025
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 [康复医学与理疗学];
摘要
Objective: To study the analgesic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex on central pain in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. Mean follow-up period was 4.5 weeks. Setting: General hospital. Participants: Twelve paraplegic patients due to thoracic SCI suffering chronic central pain (11 completed the study) who were randomly selected from a list of eligible patients. Intervention: Real or sham 10 daily motor rTMS treatments (500 trains at 5Hz for 10s; total of 500 pulses at intensity of 115% of motor threshold) using figure-of-8 coil over the vertex. Main Outcome Measures: Chronic pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS], McGill Pain Questionnaire [MPQ]), pain threshold, and level of depression (Beck Depression Inventory). Results: Both real and sham TMS induced a similar, significant reduction in VAS scores (P<.001) immediately after each of the 10 treatment sessions and in VAS and MPQ scores after the end of the treatment series. However, only real rTMS conferred a significant increase in heat-pain threshold (4 degrees C, P<.05) by the end of the series. Most important, the reduction in MPQ scores in the real rTMS group continued during the follow-up period. Depression scores were equally reduced in both groups but similar to pain relief, depression continued to improve at follow-up in the real rTMS group. Conclusions: Whereas the pain alleviation induced by a single rTMS treatment is probably due to placebo, patients with SCI may benefit from a series of rTMS treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:1574 / 1580
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain control.: Double-blind study of different frequencies against placebo, and correlation with motor cortex stimulation efficacy [J].
Andre-Obadia, Nathalie ;
Peyron, Roland ;
Mertens, Patrick ;
Mauguiere, Francois ;
Laurent, Bernard ;
Garcia-Larrea, Luis .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (07) :1536-1544
[2]
[Anonymous], 1985, Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Application
[3]
[Anonymous], TXB PAIN
[4]
AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[5]
Bowling A., 2005, MEASURING HLTH
[6]
Persistent pain and depression: A biopsychosocial perspective [J].
Campbell, LC ;
Clauw, DJ ;
Keefe, FJ .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 54 (03) :399-409
[7]
Transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation relieves central pain [J].
Canavero, S ;
Bonicalzi, V ;
Dotta, M ;
Vighetti, S ;
Asteggiano, G ;
Cocito, D .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 78 (3-4) :192-196
[8]
Characterization of chronic pain and somatosensory function in spinal cord injury subjects [J].
Defrin, R ;
Ohry, A ;
Blumen, N ;
Urca, G .
PAIN, 2001, 89 (2-3) :253-263
[9]
Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial and epidural motor cortex stimulation in a conscious patient with bulbar pain [J].
Di Lazzaro, V ;
Oliviero, A ;
Pilato, F ;
Saturno, E ;
Dileone, M ;
Meglio, M ;
Cioni, B ;
Papacci, F ;
Tonali, PA ;
Rothwell, JC .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (04) :834-838
[10]
The antalgic efficacy of chronic motor cortex stimulation is related to sensory changes in the painful zone [J].
Drouot, X ;
Nguyen, JP ;
Peschanski, M ;
Lefaucheur, JP .
BRAIN, 2002, 125 :1660-1664