Syntactic expectancy:: an event-related potentials study

被引:10
作者
Hinojosa, JA [1 ]
Moreno, EM
Casado, P
Muñoz, F
Pozo, MA
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Inst Pluridisciplinar, Human Brain Mapping Unit, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] UCM, ISCIII, Ctr Human Evolut & Behav, Cognit Neurosci Unit, E-28029 Madrid, Spain
关键词
event-related potentials; syntactic processing; recognition potential; N400;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Although extensive work has been conducted in order to study expectancies about semantic information, little effort has been dedicated to the study of the influence of expectancies in the processing of forthcoming syntactic information. The present study tries to examine the issue by presenting participants with grammatically correct sentences of two types. In the first type the critical word of the sentence belonged to the most expected word category type on the basis of the previous context (an article following a verb). In the second sentence type, the critical word was an unexpected but correct word category (an article following an adjective) when a verb is highly expected. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured to critical words in both sentence types. Brain waves evoked by the correct but syntactically unexpected word revealed the presence of a negativity with a central distribution around 300-500 ms after stimuli onset, an N400, that was absent in the case of syntactically expected words. No differences were present in previous time windows. These results support models that differentiate between the processing of expected and unexpected syntactic structures. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 39
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Grammar overrides frequency: evidence from the online processing of flexible word order [J].
Bornkessel, I ;
Schlesewsky, M ;
Friederici, AD .
COGNITION, 2002, 85 (02) :B21-B30
[2]   Parametric analysis of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension: evidence for parallel brain mechanisms [J].
Dien, J ;
Frishkoff, GA ;
Cerbone, A ;
Tucker, DM .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 15 (02) :137-153
[3]   Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing [J].
Federmeier, KD ;
Kutas, M .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (03) :373-392
[4]  
Frazier L., 1996, Construal
[5]   Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Hahne, A ;
Mecklinger, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (05) :1219-1248
[6]   Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing [J].
Friederici, AD .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (02) :78-84
[7]   Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument-specific information [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Frisch, S .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 43 (03) :476-507
[8]  
FRIEDERICI AD, 1996, JJ PSYCHOLINGUISTIC, V25, P476
[9]   The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing [J].
Frisch, S ;
Schlesewsky, M .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (15) :3391-3394
[10]   Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing [J].
Gunter, TC ;
Friederici, AD .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 36 (01) :126-137