Phytotoxicity of hydrogen fluoride and fluoroborate and their uptake from solution culture by Lycopersicon esculentum and Avena sativa

被引:31
作者
Stevens, DP [1 ]
McLaughlin, MJ
Alston, AM
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Waite Agr Res Inst, Cooperat Res Ctr Soil & Land Management, PMB, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Waite Agr Res Inst, CSIRO Land & Water, PMB, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Waite Agr Res Inst, Dept Soil Sci, PMB, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
fluoroborate; hydrogen fluoride; oat; plant uptake; solution culture; tomato;
D O I
10.1023/A:1004321602847
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The aims of this paper were to determine the phytoavailability and phytotoxicity of hydrogen fluoride (HF) and fluoroborate (BF(4)(-)) in solution when exposed to the root of the plant. As fluoroborate undergoes a slow hydrolysis to F and berate ions, the stability of BF(4)(-) under solution culture conditions was determined. Fluoroborate was found to have a zero order rate constant of 0.0136 and took approximately 72 days to hydrolyse completely. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and oat (Avena sativa) plants were grown in dilute nutrient solutions which contained a range of activities of HF and BF(4)(-). Dry matter production of both tomato and oat plants grown in nutrient solutions were found to be restricted by increased activity of HF and BF(4)(-) in solution. Tomatoes were more sensitive to HF and BF(4)(-) than oats. Limitations to dry matter production coincided with increased uptake of F for F concentrations in tissue of both tomatoes and oats. Fluoride uptake of both HF and BF by tomatoes and oats was orders of magnitude higher compared to similar activities of other ionic species of F reported in previous studies. Possible mechanisms of uptake are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 184
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Allison J.D., 1991, MINTEQA2PRODEFA2 GEO
[2]   RESPONSE OF CORN AND TOMATO PLANTS TO FLUORINE CONCENTRATION IN SOLUTION CULTURE [J].
BARYOSEF, B ;
ROSENBERG, R .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1988, 80 (02) :173-177
[3]   VARIATION IN ALUMINUM TOLERANCE AMONG AND WITHIN LOTUS LINES [J].
BLAMEY, FPC ;
WHEELER, DM ;
CHRISTIE, RA ;
EDMEADES, DC .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1990, 13 (06) :745-755
[4]  
BOVAY E, 1969, FL OFF Q J INT SOC F, V2, P222
[5]  
COLLET GF, 1969, FL OFF Q J INT SOC F, V2, P229
[6]  
DAVISON AW, 1982, FLUORIDES EFFECTS VE, P61
[7]  
KEERTHISINGHE G, 1991, DEV PLANT SOIL SCI, V45, P509
[8]  
Kneen WR, 1972, CHEM FACTS PATTERNS
[9]  
KRONBERGER W, 1987, PHYTON-ANN REI BOT A, V27, P241
[10]  
KRONBERGER W, 1988, PHYTON-ANN REI BOT A, V28, P27