Nonprice incentives and energy conservation

被引:303
作者
Asensio, Omar I. [1 ]
Delmas, Magali A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
energy conservation; decision making; health information disclosure; environmental behavior; randomized controlled trials; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; REAL-TIME; FEEDBACK; BEHAVIOR; NORMS; PERCEPTIONS; POLICY; POWER;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1401880112
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the electricity sector, energy conservation through technological and behavioral change is estimated to have a savings potential of 123 million metric tons of carbon per year, which represents 20% of US household direct emissions in the United States. In this article, we investigate the effectiveness of nonprice information strategies to motivate conservation behavior. We introduce environment and health-based messaging as a behavioral strategy to reduce energy use in the home and promote energy conservation. In a randomized controlled trial with real-time appliancelevel energy metering, we find that environment and health-based information strategies, which communicate the environmental and public health externalities of electricity production, such as pounds of pollutants, childhood asthma, and cancer, outperform monetary savings information to drive behavioral change in the home. Environment and health-based information treatments motivated 8% energy savings versus control and were particularly effective on families with children, who achieved up to 19% energy savings. Our results are based on a panel of 3.4 million hourly appliance-level kilowatt-hour observations for 118 residences over 8 mo. We discuss the relative impacts of both cost-savings information and environmental health messaging strategies with residential consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:E510 / E515
页数:6
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation [J].
Abrahamse, W ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C ;
Rothengatter, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :273-291
[2]   Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap? [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Greenstone, Michael .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (01) :3-28
[3]   Social norms and energy conservation [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (9-10) :1082-1095
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, VIRTUE ETHICS PLURAL, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199253889.001.0001
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, HIDD COSTS EN UNPR C
[6]   Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially [J].
Ariely, Dan ;
Bracha, Anat ;
Meier, Stephan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (01) :544-555
[7]   Perceptions of water use [J].
Attari, Shahzeen Z. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (14) :5129-5134
[8]   Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings [J].
Attari, Shahzeen Z. ;
DeKay, Michael L. ;
Davidson, Cliff I. ;
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (37) :16054-16059
[9]   Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage [J].
Ayres, Ian ;
Raseman, Sophie ;
Shih, Alice .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2013, 29 (05) :992-1022
[10]  
Azevedo I., 2011, The Electricity Journal, V24, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2010.12.004