Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock

被引:1436
作者
Sprung, Charles L. [1 ]
Annane, Djillali [2 ]
Keh, Didier [3 ]
Moreno, Rui [4 ]
Singer, Mervyn [5 ]
Freivogel, Klaus [6 ]
Weiss, Yoram G. [1 ]
Benbenishty, Julie [1 ]
Kalenka, Armin [7 ]
Forst, Helmuth [8 ]
Laterre, Pierre-Francois [9 ]
Reinhart, Konrad [10 ]
Cuthbertson, Brian H. [11 ]
Payen, Didier [12 ]
Briegel, Josef [13 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Gen Intens Care Unit, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] UniverSud Paris, Univ Versailles, Raymond Poincare Hosp, Garches, France
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[4] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Hosp St Antonio dos Capuchos, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] UCL, Bloomsbury Inst Intens Care Med, London, England
[6] Analytica Int, Lorrach, Germany
[7] Heidelberg Univ, Klinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[8] Zent Klinikum, Augsburg, Germany
[9] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[10] Univ Jena, Jena, Germany
[11] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[12] Denis Diderot Univ Paris, Hop Lariboisiere, Paris, France
[13] Univ Munich Klinikum, Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa071366
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hydrocortisone is widely used in patients with septic shock even though a survival benefit has been reported only in patients who remained hypotensive after fluid and vasopressor resuscitation and whose plasma cortisol levels did not rise appropriately after the administration of corticotropin. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned 251 patients to receive 50 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone and 248 patients to receive placebo every 6 hours for 5 days; the dose was then tapered during a 6-day period. At 28 days, the primary outcome was death among patients who did not have a response to a corticotropin test. Results: Of the 499 patients in the study, 233 (46.7%) did not have a response to corticotropin (125 in the hydrocortisone group and 108 in the placebo group). At 28 days, there was no significant difference in mortality between patients in the two study groups who did not have a response to corticotropin (39.2% in the hydrocortisone group and 36.1% in the placebo group, P=0.69) or between those who had a response to corticotropin (28.8% in the hydrocortisone group and 28.7% in the placebo group, P=1.00). At 28 days, 86 of 251 patients in the hydrocortisone group (34.3%) and 78 of 248 patients in the placebo group (31.5%) had died (P=0.51). In the hydrocortisone group, shock was reversed more quickly than in the placebo group. However, there were more episodes of superinfection, including new sepsis and septic shock. Conclusions: Hydrocortisone did not improve survival or reversal of shock in patients with septic shock, either overall or in patients who did not have a response to corticotropin, although hydrocortisone hastened reversal of shock in patients in whom shock was reversed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00147004.).
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 124
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis -: A randomized controlled trial
    Abraham, E
    Reinhart, K
    Opal, S
    Demeyer, I
    Doig, C
    Rodriguez, AL
    Beale, R
    Svoboda, P
    Laterre, PF
    Simon, S
    Light, B
    Spapen, H
    Stone, J
    Seibert, A
    Peckelsen, C
    De Deyne, C
    Postier, R
    Pettilä, V
    Sprung, CL
    Artigas, A
    Percell, SR
    Shu, V
    Zwingelstein, C
    Tobias, J
    Poole, L
    Stolzenbach, JC
    Creasey, AA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (02): : 238 - 247
  • [2] Absalom A, 1999, ANAESTHESIA, V54, P861
  • [3] Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care
    Angus, DC
    Linde-Zwirble, WT
    Lidicker, J
    Clermont, G
    Carcillo, J
    Pinsky, MR
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) : 1303 - 1310
  • [4] Current epidemiology of septic shock - The CUB-Rea network
    Annane, D
    Aegerter, P
    Jars-Guincestre, MC
    Guidet, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 168 (02) : 165 - 172
  • [5] Corticosteroids for severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Annane, D
    Bellissant, E
    Bollaert, PE
    Briegel, J
    Keh, D
    Kupfer, Y
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7464): : 480 - 484
  • [6] A 3-level prognostic classification in septic shock based on cortisol levels and cortisol response to corticotropin
    Annane, D
    Sébille, V
    Troché, G
    Raphaël, JC
    Gajdos, P
    Bellissant, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (08): : 1038 - 1045
  • [7] Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock
    Annane, D
    Sébille, V
    Charpentier, C
    Bollaert, PE
    François, B
    Korach, JM
    Capellier, G
    Cohen, Y
    Azoulay, E
    Troché, G
    Chaumet-Riffaut, P
    Bellissant, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (07): : 862 - 871
  • [8] Review: Hypothalamic pituitary adrenal function during critical illness: Limitations of current assessment methods
    Arafah, Baha M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2006, 91 (10) : 3725 - 3745
  • [9] AXELROD L, 2001, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P762
  • [10] Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiologic doses of hydrocortisone
    Bollaert, PE
    Charpentier, C
    Levy, B
    Debouverie, M
    Audibert, G
    Larcan, A
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) : 645 - 650