Chemically induced micronucleus formation in V79 cells - comparison of three different test approaches

被引:43
作者
Kalweit, S
Utesch, D
von der Hude, W
Madle, S
机构
[1] Fed Inst Hlth Protect Consumers & Vet Med, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Merck KGaA, Inst Toxicol, D-64271 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
in vitro micronucleus test; V79; cell;
D O I
10.1016/S1383-5718(98)00191-0
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The in vitro micronucleus test (MNT) is a useful assay for the detection of mutagenic events on both the chromosomal and the genomic level, The main disadvantage for introducing the in vitro MNT into official test guidelines seems to be the disparity of existing protocols. To contribute to the aim of standardisation, three different methodological approaches of the in vitro MNT with V79 cells were compared: the standard assay using an asynchronically growing mixed cell population, the cytokinesis block (CB) assay and a modified MNT, the so-called mitotic shake-off (MSO) method. V79 cells were thus treated with two known aneugens (colcemide and griseofulvin) and two clastogens (mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide) over various time periods. The cultures of the CB assay were additionally exposed to cytochalasin B (Cyt-B), an inhibitor of cell, but not of nucleus division. After treatment, the cells were harvested and analysed for the appearance of micronuclei (MN). All three assays yielded positive results for all test substances. These results support the suitability of the MNT with V79 cells with regard to the ability to detect the genotoxic potential of both clastogens and aneugens independent of the test protocol applied, Thus, all three methods are appropriate for MN detection, but due to the fact that the application of Cyt-B has no advantages for a cell line like V79 in which nearly all cells undergo a normal cell cycle, its use is not recommended. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 190
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Summary and conclusions on the MNT in vitro and implication on testing strategies [J].
Albertini, S ;
KirschVolders, M .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1997, 392 (1-2) :183-185
[2]  
ASHBY J, 1996, EEMS NEWSLETTER, V27, P14
[3]   MUTAGENIC ACTIVITY OF 61 AGENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE MICRONUCLEUS, SALMONELLA, AND SPERM ABNORMALITY ASSAYS [J].
BRUCE, WR ;
HEDDLE, JA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND CYTOLOGY, 1979, 21 (03) :319-333
[4]   PRODUCTION OF MICRONUCLEI FROM CHROMOSOME-ABERRATIONS IN IRRADIATED CULTURES OF HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES [J].
COUNTRYMAN, PI ;
HEDDLE, JA .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1976, 41 (2-3) :321-331
[5]   The advantages and disadvantages of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus method [J].
Fenech, M .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1997, 392 (1-2) :11-18
[6]   Towards a validation of the micronucleus test [J].
KirschVolders, M .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1997, 392 (1-2) :1-4
[7]   Toxic effects of griseofulvin: Disease models, mechanisms, and risk assessment [J].
Knasmuller, S ;
Parzefall, W ;
Helma, C ;
Kassie, F ;
Ecker, S ;
SchulteHermann, R .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 27 (05) :495-537
[8]  
Li Jie, 1993, Jikeikai Medical Journal, V40, P69
[9]   The position of the in vitro micronucleus test within the battery of screening for genotoxic potential determination and the regulatory guidelines [J].
Marzin, D .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1997, 392 (1-2) :175-181
[10]   Evaluation of the in vitro micronucleus test as an alternative to the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay:: position of the GUM working group on the in vitro micronucleus test [J].
Miller, B ;
Pötter-Locher, F ;
Seelbach, A ;
Stopper, H ;
Utesch, D ;
Madle, S .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 1998, 410 (01) :81-116