Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil when given for induction of anesthesia

被引:102
作者
Vuyk, J
Engbers, FHM
Burm, AGL
Vletter, AA
Griever, GER
Olofsen, E
Bovill, JG
机构
[1] Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Leiden, 2300 RC Leiden
关键词
anesthetic techniques; intravenous; computer-controlled infusion; anesthetics; alfentanil; propofol; pharmacodynamics; drug-drug interactions;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199602000-00006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Propofol and alfentanil often are combined during induction of anesthesia. However, the interaction between these agents during induction has not been studied in detail. The influence of alfentanil on the propofol concentration-effect relationships was studied for loss of eyelash reflex, loss of consciousness, and hemodynamic function in 20 unpremedicated ASA physical status 1 patients aged 20-55 yr, Methods: Patients were randomly divided into four groups to receive a computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil with target concentrations of 0, 50, 200, or 400 ng/ml (groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). While the target concentration of alfentanil was maintained constant, patients received a computer-controlled infusion of propofol, with an initial target concentration of 0.5-1 mu g/ml, that was increased every 12 min by 0.5-1 mu g/ml. Every 3 min, the eyelash reflex and state of consciousness were tested and an arterial blood sample was taken for blood propofol and plasma alfentanil determination. The propofol-alfentanil concentration-response relationships for loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness were determined by nonlinear regression, and for the percentage of change in systolic blood pressure and heart rate by logistic regression, Results: The patient characteristics did not differ significantly among the four groups, The patients in groups A and B continued to breathe adequately, whereas all patients in groups C and D required assisted ventilation. End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure remained less than 46 mm Hg in all patients. With plasma alfentanil concentrations increasing from 0 to 500 ng/ml, the EC,, of propofol decreased from 2.07 to 0.83 mu g/ml for loss of eyelash reflex and from 3.62 to 1.55 mu g/ml for loss of consciousness. With plasma alfentanil concentrations increasing from 0 to 500 ng/ml, the blood propofol concentrations associated with a 10% decrease in systolic blood pressure and heart rate decreased from 1.68 to 0.17 mu g/ml and from 2.36 to 0.04 mu g/ml, respectively, Conclusions: Alfentanil significantly reduces blood propofol concentrations required for loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness. In addition, alfentanil enhances the depressant effects of propofol on systolic blood pressure and heart rate. Hemodynamic stability, therefore, does not increase in patients receiving propofol in combination with alfentanil compared to those receiving propofol as the sole agent for induction of anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 299
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   MIDAZOLAM ACTS SYNERGISTICALLY WITH FENTANYL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA [J].
BENSHLOMO, I ;
ABDELKHALIM, H ;
EZRY, J ;
ZOHAR, S ;
TVERSKOY, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (01) :45-47
[2]  
BERENBAUM MC, 1989, PHARMACOL REV, V41, P93
[3]   EFFECT OF PROPOFOL ON PERIPHERAL VASCULAR-RESISTANCE DURING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS [J].
BOER, F ;
ROS, P ;
BOVILL, JG ;
VANBRUMMELEN, P ;
VANDERKROGT, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (02) :184-189
[4]  
CULLEN PM, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P1115
[5]   PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL-DRIVEN INFUSION OF FENTANYL - ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY [J].
GLASS, PSA ;
JACOBS, JR ;
SMITH, LR ;
GINSBERG, B ;
QUILL, TJ ;
BAI, SA ;
REVES, JG .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (06) :1082-1090
[6]  
HALL RI, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P1287
[7]   DOES OPIOID ANESTHESIA EXIST [J].
HUG, CC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (01) :1-4
[8]  
JACOBS JR, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P1
[9]  
KATZUNG BG, 1984, BASIC CLIN PHARM, P810
[10]   SLEEP DISRUPTION AND INCREASED APNEAS AFTER PONTINE MICROINJECTION OF MORPHINE [J].
KEIFER, JC ;
BAGHDOYAN, HA ;
LYDIC, R .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (05) :973-982