Common morality, coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics

被引:41
作者
DeGrazia, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Philosophy, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/ken.2003.0020
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The fifth edition of Beauchamp and Childress's Principles of Biomedical Ethics is distinguished by its emphatic embrace of common morality as the ultimate source of moral norms. This essay critically evaluates the fifth edition's discussion of common morality and, to a lesser extent, its treatment of coherence (both the model of ethical Justification and the associated concept). It is argued that the book is overly accommodating of existing moral beliefs. The paper concludes with three suggestions for improving this leading text.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 230
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ARMSTRONG P, 1997, HUMANE HLTH CARE INT, V13, P13
[2]  
Beauchamp TL., 2013, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[3]  
Dancy Jonathan., 1985, An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology
[4]  
Daniels N., 1996, JUSTICE JUSTIFICATIO
[5]   Why the United States should adopt a single-payer system of health care finance [J].
DeGrazia, D .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 1996, 6 (02) :145-160
[6]  
DeGrazia David., 1996, Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status
[7]   All payer, single payer, managed care, no payer: Patients' perspectives in three nations [J].
Donelan, K ;
Blendon, RJ ;
Benson, J ;
Leitman, R ;
Taylor, H .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1996, 15 (02) :254-265
[8]  
Frankena W.K., 1973, ETHICS
[10]   Will the fudge on equity sustain the NHS into the next millennium? [J].
Mays, N ;
Keen, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7150) :66-69