D3R Grand Challenge 2: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies

被引:141
作者
Gaieb, Zied [1 ]
Liu, Shuai [1 ]
Gathiaka, Symon [2 ]
Chiu, Michael [1 ]
Yang, Huanwang [3 ]
Shao, Chenghua [3 ]
Feher, Victoria A. [1 ]
Walters, W. Patrick [4 ]
Kuhn, Bernd [5 ]
Rudolph, Markus G. [5 ]
Burley, Stephen K. [3 ]
Gilson, Michael K. [1 ]
Amaro, Rommie E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Drug Design Data Resource, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Inst Quantitat Biomed, RCSB Prot Data Bank, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[4] Relay Therapeut, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[5] F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Roche Innovat Ctr Basel, Roche Pharmaceut Res & Early Dev pRED, Grenzacherstr 124, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D3R; Docking; Scoring; Ligand ranking; Alchemical methods; Farnesoid X receptor; Blinded prediction challenge; CSAR BENCHMARK EXERCISE; NUCLEAR RECEPTOR; BILE-ACIDS; FINGERPRINT METHODS; DRUG DISCOVERY; DOCKING; DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION; PERTURBATION; REFINEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-017-0088-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) ran Grand Challenge 2 (GC2) from September 2016 through February 2017. This challenge was based on a dataset of structures and affinities for the nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR), contributed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. The dataset contained 102 IC50 values, spanning six orders of magnitude, and 36 high-resolution co-crystal structures with representatives of four major ligand classes. Strong global participation was evident, with 49 participants submitting 262 prediction submission packages in total. Procedurally, GC2 mimicked Grand Challenge 2015 (GC2015), with a Stage 1 subchallenge testing ligand pose prediction methods and ranking and scoring methods, and a Stage 2 subchallenge testing only ligand ranking and scoring methods after the release of all blinded co-crystal structures. Two smaller curated sets of 18 and 15 ligands were developed to test alchemical free energy methods. This overview summarizes all aspects of GC2, including the dataset details, challenge procedures, and participant results. We also consider implications for progress in the field, while highlighting methodological areas that merit continued development. Similar to GC2015, the outcome of GC2 underscores the pressing need for methods development in pose prediction, particularly for ligand scaffolds not currently represented in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.pdb.org), and in affinity ranking and scoring of bound ligands.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Accelerating drug discovery through tight integration of expert molecular design and predictive scoring
    Abel, Robert
    Mondal, Sayan
    Masse, Craig
    Greenwood, Jeremy
    Harriman, Geraldine
    Ashwell, Mark A.
    Bhat, Sathesh
    Wester, Ronald
    Frye, Leah
    Kapeller, Rosana
    Friesner, Richard A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 43 : 38 - 44
  • [2] Predictions of Ligand Selectivity from Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations
    Aldeghi, Matteo
    Heifetz, Alexander
    Bodkin, Michael J.
    Knapp, Stefan
    Biggin, Philip C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 139 (02) : 946 - 957
  • [3] Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules
    Aldeghi, Matteo
    Heifetz, Alexander
    Bodkin, Michael J.
    Knappcd, Stefan
    Biggin, Philip C.
    [J]. CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 7 (01) : 207 - 218
  • [4] An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design
    Amaro, Rommie E.
    Baron, Riccardo
    McCammon, J. Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2008, 22 (09) : 693 - 705
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, SMALL MOL DRUG DISC
  • [6] Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge
    Bannan, Caitlin C.
    Burley, Kalistyn H.
    Chiu, Michael
    Shirts, Michael R.
    Gilson, Michael K.
    Mobley, David L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (11) : 927 - 944
  • [7] Refinement of severely incomplete structures with maximum likelihood in BUSTER-TNT
    Blanc, E
    Roversi, P
    Vonrhein, C
    Flensburg, C
    Lea, SM
    Bricogne, G
    [J]. ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 60 : 2210 - 2221
  • [8] Lessons Learned over Four Benchmark Exercises from the Community Structure-Activity Resource
    Carlson, Heather A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2016, 56 (06) : 951 - 954
  • [9] CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma
    Carlson, Heather A.
    Smith, Richard D.
    Damm-Ganamet, Kelly L.
    Stuckey, Jeanne A.
    Ahmed, Aqeel
    Convery, Maire A.
    Somers, Donald O.
    Kranz, Michael
    Elkins, Patricia A.
    Cui, Guanglei
    Peishoff, Catherine E.
    Lambert, Millard H.
    Dunbar, James B., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2016, 56 (06) : 1063 - 1077
  • [10] CHENG Y, 1973, BIOCHEM PHARMACOL, V22, P3099