Comparative analysis of different competitive antagonists interaction with NR2A and NR2B subunits of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) ionotropic glutamate receptor

被引:7
作者
Blaise, MC
Sowdhamini, R
Pradhan, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Dept Psychopharmacol, Bangalore 560029, Karnataka, India
[2] TIFR, NCBS, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India
关键词
NMDA receptor; homology modeling; docking; NR2A; NR2B; competitive antagonist; binding pocket;
D O I
10.1007/s00894-005-0258-5
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The antagonist-bound conformation of the NR2A and NR2B subunits of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) ionotropic glutamate receptor are modeled using the crystal structure of the DCKA (5,7-dichloro-kynurenic acid)-bound form of the NR1 subunit ligand-binding core (S1S2). Five different competitive NMDA receptor antagonists [(1) DL-AP5; (2) DL-AP7; (3) CGP-37847; (4) CGP 39551; (5) (RS)-CPP] have been docked into both NR2A and NR2B subunits. Experimental studies report NR2A and NR2B subunits having dissimilar interactions and affinities towards the antagonists. However, the molecular mechanism of this difference remains unexplored. The distinctive features in the antagonist's interaction with these two different but closely related (similar to 80% sequence identity at this region) subunits are analyzed from the patterns of their hydrogen bonding. The regions directly involved in the antagonist binding have been classified into seven different interaction sites. Two conserved hydrophilic pockets located at both the S1 and S2 domains are found to be crucial for antagonist binding. The positively charged (Lys) residues present at the second interaction site and the invariant residue (Arg) located at the fourth interaction site are seen to influence ligand binding. The geometry of the binding pockets of NR2A and NR2B subunits have been determined from the distance between the C-alpha atoms in the residues interacting with the ligands. The binding pockets are found to be different for NR2A and NR2B. There are gross dissimilarities in competitive antagonist binding between these two subunits. The binding pocket geometry identified in this study may have the potential for future development of selective antagonists for the NR2A or NR2B subunit.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 502
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]  
Anson LC, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P581
[3]   Molecular dynamics simulations of the ligand-binding domain of the ionotropic glutamate receptor GluR2 [J].
Arinaminpathy, Y ;
Sansom, MSP ;
Biggin, PC .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 82 (02) :676-683
[4]   Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-Sensitive glutamate receptor: Crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core [J].
Armstrong, N ;
Gouaux, E .
NEURON, 2000, 28 (01) :165-181
[5]   STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF BINDING-KINETICS FOR NMDA RECEPTOR COMPETITIVE ANTAGONISTS - THE INFLUENCE OF CONFORMATIONAL RESTRICTION [J].
BENVENISTE, M ;
MAYER, ML .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 104 (01) :207-221
[6]   N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR2A and NR2B messenger RNA levels are altered in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in Alzheimer's disease [J].
Bi, H ;
Sze, CI .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 200 (1-2) :11-18
[7]  
BLAISE M, 2004, IN PRESS J MOL MODEL
[8]   LUDI - RULE-BASED AUTOMATIC DESIGN OF NEW SUBSTITUENTS FOR ENZYME-INHIBITOR LEADS [J].
BOHM, HJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1992, 6 (06) :593-606
[10]  
BULLER AL, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P5471