Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions

被引:238
作者
Jang, S. Mo [1 ]
Kim, Joon K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, 800 Sumter St,RM122, Columbia, SC 29201 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, 800 Sumter St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Fake news; Third-person effect; Fake news regulation; Media literacy; Partisan identity; US PRESIDENTIAL-ELECTION; POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL DISTANCE; DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT; TELEVISION VIOLENCE; NATIONAL ELECTION; SELF-EFFICACY; PERCEPTIONS; ONLINE; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although the actual effect of fake news online on voters' decisions is still unknown, concerns over the perceived effect of fake news online have prevailed in the US and other countries. Based on an analysis of survey responses from national samples (n = 1299) in the US, we found a strong tendency of the third person perception. That is, individuals believed that fake news would have greater effects on out-group members than themselves or in-group members. Additionally, we proposed a theoretical path model, identifying the antecedents and consequences of the third-person perception. The results showed that partisan identity, social undesirability of content, and external political efficacy were positive predictors of the third-person perception. Interestingly, our findings revealed that third-person perception led to different ways of combating fake news online. Those with a greater level of third-person perception were more likely to support the media literacy approach but less likely to support the media regulation approach. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:8
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SOCIAL MEDIA FAKE NE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1974, IMPERATIVE FREEDOM P
[3]   Web Third-person effect in structural aspects of the information on media websites [J].
Antonopoulos, Nikos ;
Veglis, Andreas ;
Gardikiotis, Antonis ;
Kotsakis, Rigas ;
Kalliris, George .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 44 :48-58
[4]   POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL DISAFFECTION ON THE LESS EXPERIENCED VOTER [J].
AUSTIN, EW ;
PINKLETON, BE .
JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 1995, 39 (02) :215-235
[5]  
Balch GeorgeI., 1974, Political Methodology, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/25791375
[6]   Third-person effects on political participation [J].
Banning, Stephen A. .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2006, 83 (04) :785-800
[7]   Hostile Media Perceptions, Presumed Media Influence, and Political Talk: Expanding the Corrective Action Hypothesis [J].
Barnidge, Matthew ;
Rojas, Hernando .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (02) :135-156
[8]   The origins and consequences of public trust in government - A time series analysis [J].
Chanley, VA ;
Rudolph, TJ ;
Rahn, WM .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2000, 64 (03) :239-256
[9]   Triggering participation: Exploring the effects of third-person and hostile media perceptions on online participation [J].
Chung, Myojung ;
Munno, Greg J. ;
Moritz, Brian .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 53 :452-461
[10]   3RD-PERSON EFFECTS AND THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT IN NEGATIVE POLITICAL ADVERTISING [J].
COHEN, J ;
DAVIS, RG .
JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1991, 68 (04) :680-688