Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach

被引:2177
作者
Michie, S
Johnston, M
Abraham, C
Lawton, R
Parker, D
Walker, A
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Outcomes Res & Effectiveness, Dept Psychol, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Psychol, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
[3] Univ Sussex, Dept Psychol, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Dept Hlth Psychol, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Dept Psychol, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2005年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2004.011155
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in ( 1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and ( 2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience. Methods: Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: ( 1) identifying theoretical constructs; ( 2) simplifying into construct domains; ( 3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; ( 4) interdisciplinary evaluation; ( 5) validating the domain list; and ( 6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory'' group ( n = 18), a "health services research'' group ( n = 13), and a "health psychology'' group ( n = 30). Results: Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: ( 1) knowledge, ( 2) skills, ( 3) social/ professional role and identity, ( 4) beliefs about capabilities, ( 5) beliefs about consequences, ( 6) motivation and goals, ( 7) memory, attention and decision processes, ( 8) environmental context and resources, ( 9) social influences, ( 10) emotion regulation, ( 11) behavioural regulation, and ( 12) nature of the behaviour. Conclusions: A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 33
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   Hand hygiene and aseptic technique in the emergency department [J].
Al-Damouk, M ;
Pudney, E ;
Bleetman, A .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2004, 56 (02) :137-141
[3]  
ASHFORD AJ, 1998, 88 U NEWC CTR HLTH S
[4]   Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory [J].
Bandura, A .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1998, 13 (04) :623-649
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[6]  
*CHIEF MED OFF REP, 2002, GETT CURV STRAT COMB
[7]  
ECCLES M, 2004, IN PRESS J CLIN EPID
[8]  
Fetscherin M, 2008, J ELECTRON COMMER RE, V9, P231
[9]  
Fishbein M, 2001, HANDBOOK OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, P3
[10]   Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit [J].
Gollwitzer, PM ;
Brandstatter, V .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 73 (01) :186-199