How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development

被引:287
作者
Yi, Wen-Jing [1 ,3 ]
Zou, Le-Le [3 ]
Guo, Jie [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Kai [1 ,3 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CO2; intensity; Equity; Reduction target allocation; ANNEX-I; CLIMATE; COMMITMENTS; COUNTRIES; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.063
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In late 2009, the Chinese government committed to cut its carbon dioxide emissions per unit of gross domestic product (GDP) by 40% to 45% of 2005 levels by 2020. This has raised the issue of how to allocate the CO2 reduction target regionally to meet the national reduction target. To meet this objective, the following aspects may be taken into consideration: equity principles, 'common but differentiated responsibilities'; intensity reduction target fulfillment; and economic difference and reduction potential among provinces. This paper selects per capita GDP, accumulated fossil fuel related CO2 emissions and energy consumption per unit of industrial added value as indicators for emission reduction capacity, responsibility and potential, respectively. Based on these three indicators, a comprehensive index is developed and an intensity allocation model constructed. As decision makers may have different preferences when allocating the reduction burden, we allocate different weights to the indicators, analyzing the results using cluster analysis. The following aspects may also be considered together with the national regional development strategy to determine how to share the burden: the reduction potential of various regions; implementation potential of the plans; and promotion of a highly efficient low carbon economic development model. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2407 / 2415
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Aldy J.E., 2003, KYOTO ADV INT EFFORT
  • [2] Thirteen plus one: a comparison of global climate policy architectures
    Aldy, JE
    Barrett, S
    Stavins, RN
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2003, 3 (04) : 373 - 397
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention-Policy Approaches and Positive Incentives on Issues Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries: and the Role of Conservation, Sustainable Management of Forests and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks in Developing Countries UNFCCC COP 16 Cancun
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, EC CLIMATE CHANGE ST, DOI DOI 10.1378/CHEST.128.5
  • [5] [Anonymous], EQUITY CONSIDERATION
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
  • [7] Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment
    Arrow, K
    Bolin, B
    Costanza, R
    Dasgupta, P
    Folke, C
    Holling, CS
    Jansson, BO
    Levin, S
    Maler, KG
    Perrings, C
    Pimentel, D
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (01) : 13 - 15
  • [8] Baer P., 2008, GREENHOUSE DEV RIGHT, V2nd
  • [9] On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances
    Böhringer, C
    Lange, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 49 (08) : 2041 - 2055
  • [10] *CESY, 2009, CHIN EN STAT YB 2009