Validating SMOS Ocean Surface Salinity in the Atlantic With Argo and Operational Ocean Model Data

被引:27
作者
Banks, Christopher J. [1 ]
Gommenginger, Christine P.
Srokosz, Meric A.
Snaith, Helen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Oceanog Ctr, British Oceanog Data Ctr, Southampton SO14 3ZH, Hants, England
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2012年 / 50卷 / 05期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Microwave radiometry; remote sensing; sea surface; CALIBRATION; MISSION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2011.2167340
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper provides an assessment of synoptic measurements of sea surface salinity (SSS) from the European Space Agency Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite. Due to the complex nature of the response of L-band signals to SSS, SMOS provides three values of SSS at each grid point from three different forward models. To meet oceanographic requirements for SSS retrieval accuracy, SMOS Level 2 SSS products are averaged over time and space. This paper reports on validation studies in the Atlantic based on monthly Level 3 products on a 1 degrees x 1 degrees grid for September 2010. Outside coastal regions, large-scale SSS patterns from SMOS are in general agreement with climatology, Argo, and ocean model output. During September 2010, SSS from descending passes provides reasonable quantitative estimates, while SSS from ascending passes overestimates SSS by over 1 practical salinity unit (psu). The daily mean difference in SSS between ascending and descending passes varies during August-December 2010, reaching a maximum in September. Differences in SMOS SSS from the three models are an order of magnitude smaller than differences between ascending and descending passes. Gridded SMOS SSS data are compared against output from the U. K. Met Office Forecasting Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM)-Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO). Basic checks confirm that SSS from FOAM-NEMO is unbiased against Argo and that FOAM-NEMO SSS is a useful independent data source to validate and rapidly identify departures in SMOS SSS. Over the whole Atlantic, SMOS SSS variability against FOAM-NEMO is around 0.9 psu, decreasing to 0.5 psu over the subtropical North Atlantic.
引用
收藏
页码:1688 / 1702
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Banks C. J., J ATMOS OCEAN UNPUB
[2]   ARGO upper salinity measurements: Perspectives for L-band radiometers calibration and retrieved sea surface salinity validation [J].
Boutin, J ;
Martin, N .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2006, 3 (02) :202-206
[3]  
Boutin J, 2004, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V21, P1432, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<1432:SSRFSM>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   SMOS calibration [J].
Brown, Michael A. ;
Torres, Francesc ;
Corbella, Ignasi ;
Colliander, Andreas .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 46 (03) :646-658
[6]  
CARVAL T, 2006, ARGO DATA MANAGEMENT
[7]  
Fetterer F., 2002, SEA ICE INDEX
[8]   SMOS: The Challenging Sea Surface Salinity Measurement From Space [J].
Font, Jordi ;
Camps, Adriano ;
Borges, Andres ;
Martin-Neira, Manuel ;
Boutin, Jacqueline ;
Reul, Nicolas ;
Kerr, Yann H. ;
Hahne, Achim ;
Mecklenburg, Susanne .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2010, 98 (05) :649-665
[9]   A new empirical model of sea surface microwave emissivity for salinity remote sensing -: art. no. L01309 [J].
Gabarró, C ;
Font, J ;
Camps, A ;
Vall-Ilossera, M ;
Julià, A .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (01) :L013091-5
[10]  
Gould J., 2004, EOS T AGU, V85, P185, DOI [DOI 10.1029/2004EO190002, 10.1029/2004EO190002]