First line chemotherapy with gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer elderly patients:: a randomized phase II study of 3-week versus 4-week schedule

Purpose: This randomized phase II multicenter trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the 4-week versus 3-week schedules of gemcitabine monotherapy in previously untreated elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, and age between 70 and 90 years, were randomized to receive gemcitabine dose of either 1000mg/ml on days 1, 8, 15, every 28 days (arm Q4W), or 1125mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days (arm Q3W). Results: From June. 1999 to January 2001, 81 patients (42 on arm Q4W; 39 on arm Q3W) were included. The median age was 75 on both arms; most patients (82.7%) were mate, and had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 or 90 (76.5%). For arms Q4W and Q3W, respectively, the median time to treatment failure was 83 days (95% CI, 69-98 days) versus 92 days (95% CI, 63-113), and the median survival was 154 days (95% CI, 108-227) versus 205 days (95% CI, 125-344). The objective response rate was higher on arm Q3W (28.2%) than on arm Q4W (14.3%). Total number of cycles administered was 132 on arm Q4W (median 3, range 1-10 cycles) and 169 on arm Q3W (median 4, range 1-9 cycles). Patients on arm Q4W and Q3W, respectively, received 100.1 and 99.8% of the planned-weekly mean dose. The most common grade, three to four toxicities, was neutropenia (17.1% on arm Q4W versus 18.9% on arm Q3W) and thrombocytopehia (12.2% on arm Q4W versus 2.6% on arm Q3W). Conclusion: Although both 3- and 4-week gemcitabine regimens were safety and effectively administered in chemonaive elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, the 3-week schedule appears to be the more convenient for this population. Moreover, even if this is only a phase II study this 3-week schedule appears to be at least as efficient as the 4-week regimen. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.