Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective evaluation of 600 cases

被引:101
作者
Rozet, F [1 ]
Galiano, M [1 ]
Cathelineau, X [1 ]
Barret, E [1 ]
Cathala, N [1 ]
Vallancien, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Inst Montsouris, Dept Urol, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000169260.42845.c9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We report our experience with the extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We describe the technique, clinical and oncological results, and functional outcome. Materials and Methods: From February 2002, to March 2004, 600 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed by an extraperitoneal approach and evaluated prospectively. Results: A total of 599 extraperitoneal procedures were performed successfully. Mean operative time was 173 minutes. Mean operative blood loss was 380 cc. The transfusion rate was 1.2%. The major and minor complications rate was 2.3% and 9.2%, respectively. The reoperation rate was 1.7%. Mean hospital stay was 6.3 days. Pathological stage was pT2 and pT3 in 72% and 28% of cases, respectively. Mean Gleason score was 7. The overall positive margin rate was 17.7% (14.6% and 25.6% of pT2 and pT3 tumors, respectively). Median followup was 12 months. Of the patients 95% had prostate specific antigen less than 0.2 ng/ml. Patients were evaluated by a self-questionnaire sent by mail before and after surgery (International Continence Society and International Index of Erectile Function-5). At a median followup of 12 months 84% of the patients were continent (no pad), 7% used 1 precautionary pad and 7% needed 1 pad routinely. At a median followup of 6 months in preoperatively potent patients (International Index of Erectile Function-5 greater than 20) the postoperative erection and intercourse rate was 64% and 43%, respectively, in those with bilateral nerve bundle preservation. Conclusions: The extraperitoneal technique is a reliable approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 911
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Abreu SC, 2002, J UROLOGY, V167, P19
  • [2] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases
    Bollens, R
    Vanden Bossche, M
    Roumeguere, T
    Damoun, A
    Ekane, S
    Hoffmann, P
    Zlotta, AR
    Schulman, CC
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [3] Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A false debate over a real challenge
    Cathelineau, X
    Cahill, D
    Widmer, H
    Rozet, F
    Baumert, H
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) : 714 - 716
  • [4] Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Dillioglugil, O
    Leibman, BD
    Leibman, NS
    Kattan, MW
    Rosas, AL
    Scardino, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) : 1760 - 1767
  • [5] Dubernard P, 2003, PROG UROL, V13, P163
  • [6] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series
    Eden, CG
    Cahill, D
    Vass, JA
    Adams, TH
    Dauleh, MI
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (09) : 876 - 882
  • [7] Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The montsouris 3-year experience
    Guillonneau, B
    Rozet, F
    Cathelineau, X
    Lay, F
    Barret, E
    Doublet, JD
    Baumert, H
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [8] Laparoscopic management of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Guillonneau, B
    Gupta, R
    El Fettouh, H
    Cathelineau, X
    Baumert, H
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (05) : 1694 - 1696
  • [9] Guillonneau B, 1998, PRESSE MED, V27, P1570
  • [10] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures
    Guillonneau, B
    Cathelineau, X
    Doublet, JD
    Baumert, H
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 43 (02) : 123 - 133