Comparative models of GABAA receptor extracellular and transmembrane domains:: Important insights in pharmacology and function

被引:113
作者
Ernst, M
Bruckner, S
Boresch, S
Sieghart, W
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Brain Res, Div Biochem & Mol Biol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Biomol & Struct Chem, Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1124/mol.105.015982
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Comparative models of the extracellular and transmembrane domains of GABA(A) receptors in the agonist-free state were generated based on the recently published structures of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. The models were validated by computational methods, and their reliability was estimated by analyzing conserved and variable elements of the cys-loop receptor topology. In addition, the methodological limits in the interpretation of such anion channel receptor models are discussed. Alignment ambiguities in the helical domain were resolved for helix 3 by placing two gaps into the linker connecting helices 2 and 3. The resulting models were shown to be consistent with a wide range of pharmacological and mutagenesis data from GABA(A) and glycine receptors. The loose packing of the models results in a large amount of solvent-accessible space and offers a natural explanation for the rich pharmacology and the great flexibility of these receptors that are known to exist in numerous drug-induced conformational states. Putative drug binding pockets found within and between subunits are described, and amino acid residues important for the action and subtype selectivity of volatile and intravenous anesthetics, barbiturates, and furosemide are shown to be part of these pockets. The entire helical domain, however, seems to be crucial not only for binding of drugs but also for transduction of binding to gating or of allosteric modulation. These models can now be used to design new experiments for clarification of pharmacological and structural questions as well as for investigating and visualizing drug induced conformational changes.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1300
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Gabaa receptor structure-function studies:: A reexamination in light of new acetylcholine receptor structures [J].
Akabas, MH .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY, VOL 62, 2004, 62 :1-43
[2]   Defining the propofol binding site location on the GABAA receptor [J].
Bali, M ;
Akabas, MH .
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 65 (01) :68-76
[3]   The in vitro and in vivo enantio selectivity of etomidate implicates the GABAA receptor in general anaesthesia [J].
Belelli, D ;
Muntoni, AL ;
Merrywest, SD ;
Gentet, LJ ;
Casula, A ;
Callachan, H ;
Madau, P ;
Gemmell, DK ;
Hamilton, NM ;
Lambert, JJ ;
Sillar, KT ;
Peters, JA .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 45 (01) :57-71
[4]   Molecular modeling of ligand-gated ion channels: Progress and challenges [J].
Bertaccini, E ;
Trudell, JR .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY, VOL 48, 2001, 48 :141-166
[5]  
Boileau AJ, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P10213
[6]   Coupling of agonist binding to channel gating in an ACh-binding protein linked to an ion channel [J].
Bouzat, C ;
Gumilar, F ;
Spitzmaul, G ;
Wang, HL ;
Rayes, D ;
Hansen, SB ;
Taylor, P ;
Sine, SM .
NATURE, 2004, 430 (7002) :896-900
[7]   Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS [J].
Brady, GP ;
Stouten, PFW .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2000, 14 (04) :383-401
[8]   Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors [J].
Brejc, K ;
van Dijk, WJ ;
Klaassen, RV ;
Schuurmans, M ;
van der Oost, J ;
Smit, AB ;
Sixma, TK .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6835) :269-276
[9]   A single glycine residue at the entrance to the first membrane-spanning domain of the γ-aminobutyric acid type a receptor β2 subunit affects allosteric sensitivity to GABA and anesthetics [J].
Carlson, BX ;
Engblom, AC ;
Kristiansen, U ;
Schousboe, A ;
Olsen, RW .
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 57 (03) :474-484
[10]   Comparative modeling of GABAA receptors:: Limits, insights, future developments [J].
Ernst, M ;
Brauchart, D ;
Boresch, S ;
Sieghart, W .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 119 (04) :933-943