Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition

被引:3891
作者
Bassi, C [1 ]
Dervenis, C
Butturini, G
Fingerhut, A
Yeo, C
Izbicki, J
Neoptolemos, J
Sarr, M
Traverso, W
Buchler, M
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Hosp GB Rossi, Surg & Gastroenterol Dept, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Agia Olga Hosp, Dept Surg, Athens, Greece
[3] Ctr Hosp Intercommunal, Gen & Digest Surg Unit, Poissy, France
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[5] Univ Hamburg Hosp, Dept Surg, D-2000 Hamburg, Germany
[6] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Virginia Mason Clin, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[9] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Surg, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is still regarded as a major complication. The incidence of POPF varies greatly in different reports, depending on the definition applied at each surgical center. OUT aim was to agree upon an objective and internationally accepted definition to allow comparison of different surgical experiences. Methods. An international panel of pancreatic surgeons, working in well-known, high-volume centers, reviewed the literature on the topic and worked together to develop a simple, objective, reliable, and easy-to-apply definition of POPF, graded primarily on clinical impact. Results. A POPF represents a failure of healing/sealing of a pancreatic-enteric anastomosis or a parenchymal leak not directly related to an anastomosis. An all-inclusive definition is a drain output of any measurable volume of fluid on or after postoperative day 3 with an amylase content greater than 3 times the serum amylase activity. Three different grades of POPF (grades A, B, C) are defined according to the clinical impact on the patient's hospital course. Conclusions. The present definition and clinical grading of POPF should allow realistic comparisons of surgical experiences in the future when new techniques, new operations, or new pharmacologic agents that may impact surgical treatment of pancreatic disorders are addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Akhrass R, 1997, AM SURGEON, V63, P598
  • [2] Andivot T, 1996, ANN CHIR, V50, P431
  • [3] Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections - Changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization
    Balcom, JH
    Rattner, DW
    Warshaw, AL
    Chang, Y
    Fernandez-del Castillo, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (04) : 391 - 397
  • [4] Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection - The importance of definitions
    Bassi, C
    Butturini, G
    Molinari, E
    Mascetta, G
    Salvia, R
    Falconi, M
    Gumbs, A
    Pederzoli, P
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 21 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [5] Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: Results on 150 consecutive patients
    Bassi, C
    Falconi, M
    Salvia, R
    Mascetta, G
    Molinari, E
    Pederzoli, P
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 18 (06) : 453 - 457
  • [6] Bassi C, 1999, HPB, V1, P203, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1365-182X(17)30671-8
  • [7] Berdah S, 1997, EUR J SURG, V163, P365
  • [8] Brennan MF, 1996, ANN SURG, V223, P506, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199605000-00006
  • [9] Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery
    Bruce, J
    Krukowski, ZH
    Al-Khairy, G
    Russell, EM
    Park, KGM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (09) : 1157 - 1168
  • [10] ROLE OF OCTREOTIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING PANCREATIC RESECTION
    BUCHLER, M
    FRIESS, H
    KLEMPA, I
    HERMANEK, P
    SULKOWSKI, U
    BECKER, H
    SCHAFMAYER, A
    BACA, I
    LORENZ, D
    MEISTER, R
    KREMER, B
    WAGNER, P
    WITTE, J
    ZURMAYER, EL
    SAEGER, HD
    RIECK, B
    DOLLINGER, P
    GLASER, K
    TEICHMANN, R
    KONRADT, J
    GAUS, W
    DENNLER, HJ
    WELZEL, D
    BEGER, HG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (01) : 125 - 131