Associative and dissociative cognitive strategies in exercise and running: 20 years later, what do we know?

被引:117
作者
Masters, KS [1 ]
Ogles, BM
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Psychol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Ohio Univ, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1123/tsp.12.3.253
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Association and dissociation (A/D) have been identified as important cognitive strategies in the literature on running and exercise. This paper is a comprehensive review of the 20 years of research in the area. Specific topics addressed include historical context, definition and terminology considerations, measurement and design issues, and findings as they pertain to performance, injury, and pain. Several research recommendations are made including change from using the term dissociation, use of multiple measurement methods, diversity of research designs, and study of topics, such as injury, exercise adherence, and emotionality, as they relate to A/D. Finally, practical findings indicate that association relates to faster performance, dissociation relates to lower perceived exertion and possibly greater endurance, and dissociation is not related to injury but association may be.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 270
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Applied sport psychology
[2]  
Brewer B.W., 1996, APPL RES COACHING AT, V11, P1
[3]   EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL FOCUSING ON PAIN PERCEPTION [J].
BREWER, BW ;
KAROLY, P .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 1989, 13 (03) :193-203
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF INTERNAL VERSUS EXTERNAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING ON SYMPTOM PERCEPTION IN AN EXERCISE SETTING [J].
FILLINGIM, RB ;
FINE, MA .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 5 (02) :115-123
[6]  
GILL DL, 1985, INT J SPORT PSYCHOL, V16, P217
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF RUNNING, ENVIRONMENT, AND ATTENTIONAL FOCUS ON ATHLETES CATECHOLAMINE AND CORTISOL-LEVELS AND MOOD [J].
HARTE, JL ;
EIFERT, GH .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 32 (01) :49-54
[8]  
Johnson James H, 1992, J SPORT BEHAV, V15, P119
[9]  
LAASCH C, 1994, IMAGINATION COGNITIO, V14, P317
[10]  
LAMBERT A J, 1985, Current Psychological Research and Reviews, V4, P239, DOI 10.1007/BF02686574