Diet composition, forage selection, and potential for forage competition among elk, deer, and livestock on aspen-sagebrush summer range

被引:71
作者
Beck, JL [1 ]
Peek, JM
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Zool & Physiol, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Fish & Wildlife Resources, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
关键词
alkaloids; cattle; diet overlap; domestic sheep; feeding sites; Nevada; spurred lupine;
D O I
10.2111/03-13.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 [生物信息与计算生物学]; 0713 [生态学];
摘要
We evaluated elk (Cervus elaphus), mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), cattle (Bos taurus), and domestic sheep (Ovis aries) diet composition, diet overlap, and forage selection on aspen (Populus tremuloides Michaux)-sagebrush (Artemisia spp. L.) summer range in northeastern Nevada to understand potential for forage competition to provide better information for managing these communities. Diets were determined through microhistological fecal analysis from 1998 to 2000, and forage selection was evaluated at feeding sites in aspen and sagebrush communities in 1999 and 2000. Elk spring diets were the most diverse in composition; summer elk diets were dominated by forbs (59%-78/(.); deer consumed mostly woody browse (64%-72%); and cattle and sheep ate mostly graminoids. Lupines (Lupinus spp. L.) constituted >= 11% of elk, deer, and sheep diets in summer. Spurred lupine (Lupinus caudatus Kellogg) was the lupine typically selected in feeding sites and greatest consumption occurred in summer when total alkaloid levels were lowest. Highest diet overlap was between cattle and sheep in 1999 (68%) and lowest between deer and cattle in 2000 (3%). Summer elk and deer diets overlapped moderately (45%-59%). Diets did not differ between elk in spring with sheep, elk in summer with deer and sheep, or cattle with sheep. Cattle foraged selectively on forbs in aspen communities (68%) and on graminoids in sagebrush communities (88%), reflecting relative forage availabilities. We detected no differences among elk, cattle, and sheep for forage selection in aspen communities. Electivity indices indicated elk preferred forbs in aspen and sagebrush communities; cattle preferred graminoids in sagebrush; and foraging sheep preferred forbs in aspen. Our results suggest potential for forage competition among ungulates on aspen-sagebrush summer range is highest for forbs in aspen communities. Monitoring productivity and use of key forage species, particularly forbs in aspen communities, should complement management objectives on shared aspen-sagebrush summer range.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 147
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
SOME COMMENTS ON MEASURING NICHE OVERLAP [J].
ABRAMS, P .
ECOLOGY, 1980, 61 (01) :44-49
[2]
COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF HABITAT USE FROM ANIMAL RADIO-TRACKING DATA [J].
AEBISCHER, NJ ;
ROBERTSON, PA ;
KENWARD, RE .
ECOLOGY, 1993, 74 (05) :1313-1325
[3]
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF BEHAVIOR - SAMPLING METHODS [J].
ALTMANN, J .
BEHAVIOUR, 1974, 49 (3-4) :227-267
[4]
Anderson T.W., 1986, STAT ANAL DATA, V2nd
[5]
VALUES OF 4 COMMUNITIES FOR MULE DEER ON RANGES WITH LIMITED SUMMER HABITAT [J].
AUSTIN, DD ;
URNESS, PJ .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1985, 38 (02) :167-171
[6]
BECK JL, 1996, INTRP491 USDA FOR SE
[7]
BECK JL, 2003, THESIS U IDAHO MOSCO
[8]
Bonham C.D., 1989, Measurements for terrestrial vegetation
[9]
The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment:: a case of summer nutritional constraint? [J].
Bugalho, MN ;
Milne, JA .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 181 (1-2) :23-29
[10]
*BUR LAND MAN, 1996, BLMRSST96002