Fallacies of risk

被引:17
作者
Hansson, SO [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, Philosophy Unit, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
risk; fallacies; argumentation;
D O I
10.1080/1366987042000176262
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In addition to traditional fallacies such as ad hominem, discussions of risk contain logical and argumentative fallacies that are specific to the subject-matter. Ten such fallacies are identified, that can commonly be found in public debates on risk. They are named as follows: the sheer size fallacy, the converse sheer size fallacy, the fallacy of naturalness, the ostrich's fallacy, the proof-seeking fallacy, the delay fallacy, the technocratic fallacy, the consensus fallacy, the fallacy of pricing, and the infallibility fallacy.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 360
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, INFORMAL FALLACIES, DOI DOI 10.1075/PBCS.4
[2]  
BOLIN B, 1993, NWO HUYG LECT 16 NOV
[3]  
Hansson S. O., 1999, RISK, V10, P101
[4]  
Hansson S.O., 1997, P ANN M SOC RISK AN, P594
[5]   Should we avoid moral dilemmas? (Values and consistency) [J].
Hansson, SO .
JOURNAL OF VALUE INQUIRY, 1998, 32 (03) :407-416
[6]  
Hansson SO, 1996, PHILOS SOC SCI, V26, P369
[7]  
Hansson Sven Ove, 1998, Setting the Limit: Occupational Health Standards and the Limits of Science
[8]  
Health Physics Society, 1996, RAD RISK PERSP
[9]   ON THE SERIOUSNESS OF MISTAKES [J].
LEVI, I .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1962, 29 (01) :47-65
[10]   ON THE CONCEPT OF THRESHOLD [J].
MASTROMATTEO, E .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1981, 42 (11) :763-770