Long-term impact of a stand-replacing fire on ecosystem CO2 exchange of a ponderosa pine forest

被引:119
作者
Dore, S. [1 ]
Kolb, T. E. [1 ,2 ]
Montes-Helu, M. [1 ]
Sullivan, B. W. [1 ]
Winslow, W. D. [1 ]
Hart, S. C. [1 ,2 ]
Kaye, J. P. [3 ]
Koch, G. W. [2 ,4 ]
Hungate, B. A. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] No Arizona Univ, Merriam Powell Ctr Environm Res, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] No Arizona Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
关键词
carbon; CO2; flux; conifer; disturbance; eddy covariance; GPP; NEE; Pinus ponderosa; respiration;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01613.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests of the southwestern United States are a mosaic of stands where undisturbed forests are carbon sinks, and stands recovering from wildfires may be sources of carbon to the atmosphere for decades after the fire. However, the relative magnitude of these sinks and sources has never been directly measured in this region, limiting our understanding of the role of fire in regional and US carbon budgets. We used the eddy covariance technique to measure the CO2 exchange of two forest sites, one burned by fire in 1996, and an unburned forest. The fire was a high-intensity stand-replacing burn that killed all trees. Ten years after the fire, the burned site was still a source of CO2 to the atmosphere [109 +/- 6 (SEM) g C m(-2) yr(-1)], whereas the unburned site was a sink (-164 +/- 23 g C m(-2) yr(-1)). The fire reduced total carbon storage and shifted ecosystem carbon allocation from the forest floor and living biomass to necromass. Annual ecosystem respiration was lower at the burned site (480 +/- 5 g C m(-2) yr(-1)) than at the unburned site (710 +/- 54 g C m(-2) yr(-1)), but the difference in gross primary production was even larger (372 +/- 13 g C m(-2) yr(-1) at the burned site and 858 +/- 37 g C m(-2) yr(-1)at the unburned site). Water availability controlled carbon flux in the warm season at both sites, and the burned site was a source of carbon in all months, even during the summer, when wet and warm conditions favored respiration more than photosynthesis. Our study shows that carbon losses following stand-replacing fires in ponderosa pine forests can persist for decades due to slow recovery of the gross primary production. Because fire exclusion is becoming increasingly difficult in dry western forests, a large US forest carbon sink could shift to a decadal-scale carbon source.
引用
收藏
页码:1801 / 1820
页数:20
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Post-fire carbon dioxide fluxes in the western Canadian boreal forest: evidence from towers, aircraft and remote sensing [J].
Amiro, BD ;
MacPherson, JI ;
Desjardins, RL ;
Chen, JM ;
Liu, J .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2003, 115 (1-2) :91-107
[2]   Paired-tower measurements of carbon and energy fluxes following disturbance in the boreal forest [J].
Amiro, BD .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2001, 7 (03) :253-268
[3]   BOREAS flight measurements of forest-fire effects on carbon dioxide and energy fluxes [J].
Amiro, BD ;
MacPherson, JI ;
Desjardins, RL .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1999, 96 (04) :199-208
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, PHYSL ECOLOGY N AM P, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4830-3_4
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, J GEOPHYS RES ATMOS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1974, INT16 USDA FOR SERV
[7]   Carbon and water vapor exchange of an open-canopied ponderosa pine ecosystem [J].
Anthoni, PM ;
Law, BE ;
Unsworth, MH .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1999, 95 (03) :151-168
[8]   Estimation of the carbon sequestration by a heterogeneous forest: night flux corrections, heterogeneity of the site and inter-annual variability [J].
Aubinet, M ;
Heinesch, B ;
Longdoz, B .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2002, 8 (11) :1053-1071
[9]  
Aubinet M, 2000, ADV ECOL RES, V30, P113, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60018-5
[10]   FOREST WILDFIRES AS A RECENT SOURCE OF CO2 AT NORTHERN LATITUDES [J].
AUCLAIR, AND ;
CARTER, TB .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1993, 23 (08) :1528-1536