Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response framework

被引:205
作者
Wolfslehner, Bernhard [1 ]
Vacik, Harald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci, Inst Silviculture, Dept Forest & Soil Sci, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
sustainable forest management; indicators; Pressure-State-response model; Analytic Network Process (ANP);
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays forestry faces a complex management situation; the understanding of sustainable forest management (SFM) has gone far beyond the original meaning of sustainable yield of timber. SFM strategies should fulfil ecological, economic and social functions without causing damage to other ecosystems. In this understanding, forest management actions cannot be seen as isolated or mono-causal. In this case study, indicators for SFM are arranged in a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) framework at forest management unit level. This framework links pressures on the environment caused by human activities with changes of environmental state (condition) parameters. Forest management also responds to these changes by instituting environmental and economic measures to reduce pressures and restore natural resources. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is utilized to evaluate the performance of four management strategies with regard to the PSR framework on SFM. Priorities of indicators and alternatives are modelled with the ANP resulting from the interconnections to other indicators and their respective cumulative importance. The approach allows for more detailed information on the network of human influences and their impacts on forest ecosystems and goes beyond the limitations of flat-dimensioned indicator sets. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EFI P
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, GRUNDRISS WALDBAUS L
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, UN C ENV DEV RIO JAN
[4]  
Bousson E, 2001, EUR FOREST INST PROC, P151
[5]   Developing indicators for the sustainable management of mountain forests using a modelling approach [J].
Brang, P ;
Courbaud, B ;
Fischer, A ;
Kissling-Näf, I ;
Pettenella, D ;
Schönenberger, W ;
Spörk, J ;
Grimm, V .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2002, 4 (02) :113-123
[6]   Combining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes. An iterative real-time procedure [J].
Brans, JP ;
Macharis, C ;
Kunsch, PL ;
Chevalier, A ;
Schwaninger, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 109 (02) :428-441
[7]   Developing sustainability indicators for mountain ecosystems: a study of the Cairngorms, Scotland [J].
Crabtree, B ;
Bayfield, N .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 52 (01) :1-14
[8]   Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey 2000 [J].
Firbank, LG ;
Barr, CJ ;
Bunce, RGH ;
Furse, MT ;
Haines-Young, R ;
Hornung, M ;
Howard, DC ;
Sheail, J ;
Sier, A ;
Smart, SM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 67 (03) :207-218
[9]  
Institute W.R., 1995, Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development, V36
[10]  
*ISCI, 1996, INT SEM CRIT IND SUS